Authors -- Fiction; England -- Fiction; Philosophy -- Fiction
_The Rev. Dr. Folliott_.—In these cases, I do. They are both one, with a
slight difference. The one is the literature of pantomime, the other is
the pantomime of literature. There is the same variety of character, the
same diversity of story, the same copiousness of incident, the same
research into costume, the same display of heraldry, falconry,
minstrelsy, scenery, monkery, witchery, devilry, robbery, poachery,
piracy, fishery, gipsy-astrology, demonology, architecture,
fortification, castrametation, navigation; the same running base of love
and battle. The main difference is, that the one set of amusing fictions
is told in music and action; the other in all the worst dialects of the
English language. As to any sentence worth remembering, any moral or
political truth, anything having a tendency, however remote, to make men
wiser or better, to make them think, to make them ever think of thinking;
they are both precisely alike _nuspiam_, _nequaquam_, _nullibi_,
_nullimodis_.
_Lady Clarinda_.—Very amusing, however.
_The Rev. Dr. Folliott_.—Very amusing, very amusing.
_Mr. Chainmail_.—My quarrel with the northern enchanter is, that he has
grossly misrepresented the twelfth century.
_The Rev. Dr. Folliott_.—He has misrepresented everything, or he would
not have been very amusing. Sober truth is but dull matter to the
reading rabble. The angler, who puts not on his hook the bait that best
pleases the fish, may sit all day on the bank without catching a gudgeon.
_Mr. Mac Quedy_.—But how do you mean that he has misrepresented the
twelfth century? By exhibiting some of its knights and ladies in the
colours of refinement and virtue, seeing that they were all no better
than ruffians, and something else that shall be nameless?
_Mr. Chainmail_.—By no means. By depicting them as much worse than they
were, not, as you suppose, much better. No one would infer from his
pictures that theirs was a much better state of society than this which
we live in.
_Mr. Mac Quedy_.—No, nor was it. It was a period of brutality,
ignorance, fanaticism, and tyranny; when the land was covered with
castles, and every castle contained a gang of banditti, headed by a
titled robber, who levied contributions with fire and sword; plundering,
torturing, ravishing, burying his captives in loathsome dungeons, and
broiling them on gridirons, to force from them the surrender of every
particle of treasure which he suspected them of possessing; and fighting
every now and then with the neighbouring lords, his conterminal bandits,
for the right of marauding on the boundaries. This was the twelfth
century, as depicted by all contemporary historians and poets.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account