Authors -- Fiction; England -- Fiction; Philosophy -- Fiction
_Mr. Chainmail_.—No, sir. Weigh the evidence of specific facts; you will
find more good than evil. Who was England’s greatest hero—the mirror of
chivalry, the pattern of honour, the fountain of generosity, the model to
all succeeding ages of military glory? Richard the First. There is a
king of the twelfth century. What was the first step of liberty? Magna
Charta. That was the best thing ever done by lords. There are lords of
the twelfth century. You must remember, too, that these lords were petty
princes, and made war on each other as legitimately as the heads of
larger communities did or do. For their system of revenue, it was, to be
sure, more rough and summary than that which has succeeded it, but it was
certainly less searching and less productive. And as to the people, I
content myself with these great points: that every man was armed, every
man was a good archer, every man could and would fight effectively, with
sword or pike, or even with oaken cudgel; no man would live quietly
without beef and ale if he had them not; he fought till he either got
them, or was put out of condition to want them. They were not, and could
not be, subjected to that powerful pressure of all the other classes of
society, combined by gunpowder, steam, and _fiscality_, which has brought
them to that dismal degradation in which we see them now. And there are
the people of the twelfth century.
_Mr. Mac Quedy_.—As to your king, the enchanter has done him ample
justice, even in your own view. As to your lords and their ladies, he
has drawn them too favourably, given them too many of the false colours
of chivalry, thrown too attractive a light on their abominable doings.
As to the people, he keeps them so much in the background, that he can
hardly be said to have represented them at all, much less misrepresented
them, which indeed he could scarcely do, seeing that, by your own
showing, they were all thieves, ready to knock down any man for what they
could not come by honestly.
_Mr. Chainmail_.—No, sir. They could come honestly by beef and ale,
while they were left to their simple industry. When oppression
interfered with them in that, then they stood on the defensive, and
fought for what they were not permitted to come by quietly.
_Mr. Mac Quedy_.—If A., being aggrieved by B., knocks down C., do you
call that standing on the defensive?
_Mr. Chainmail_.—That depends on who or what C. is.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account