The explanation of this interesting phenomenon of the production of
vicinal faces is one intimately connected with the structure of
crystals, and it forms one of the strongest confirmations of the
correctness of the theory of crystal structure the basis of which is the
molecular space-lattice. Miers is in full agreement with the author in
emphasising the importance of the space-lattice formed by the “points”
representative of the molecules, and analogously chosen in the
molecules. He says: “Whatever structures may be necessary to account for
other features of crystals, there is little doubt that we are justified
in regarding their faces as the planes of a space-lattice.”[22] Now
Wulff,[23] who has contributed very considerably to our knowledge of the
nature of the act of crystallisation, has proved, from his own
investigations and those of Weyberg, carried out at his suggestion in
his laboratory at Warsaw,[24] that faces of greatest reticular density,
that is, those along which the points of the space-lattice are most
thickly strewn, are those which grow the most slowly, and therefore are
the best developed. This latter will be obvious on a little
consideration, for the faces of less reticular density which grow more,
tend in doing so to extend the boundaries of the faces of greatest
reticular density, and thus to enlarge those faces. Hence the usual
planes on a crystal must be those of high reticular density; and these
are such as are represented by the simplest indices, the faces most
dense of all in points being the primary ones.
But it has been shown from the researches of Miers that vicinal faces
are often produced in preference to these simple index planes of high
density, and such vicinal faces, although the nearest (in angular
position) of all possible faces to those simple index planes, are
themselves of excessively low reticular density, so much so that if
represented by indices at all they can only be indicated by very high
numbers, not such as we are accustomed to consider as in keeping with
the simple spirit of the law of rational indices. Taking the example
worked out most fully by Miers, the octahedral crystals of alum, it is a
fact that the cubic faces of highest reticular density are those of the
cube itself, then come in order those of the rhombic dodecahedron and
those of the octahedron. Hence, the density of octahedral faces is very
high. But those of the very low triakis octahedron, which Miers finds to
replace the octahedron faces so frequently as vicinal faces, are of
excessively low reticular density.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account