Considering, therefore, all these facts, it is truly surprising that
Haüy should have been able to have laid so accurately the foundations of
the science of crystallography. That he undoubtedly did so, thus
securing to himself for all time the term which is currently applied to
him of “father of crystallography,” is clearly apparent from a perusal
of his book and of his subsequent memoirs.
The above only represents a small portion of Haüy’s achievements. For he
discovered, besides, the law of rational indices, the generalisation
which is at the root of crystallographic science, limiting, as it does,
the otherwise infinite number of possible crystal forms to comparatively
few, which alone are found to be capable of existence as actual
crystals. The essence of this law, which will be fully explained in
Chapter V., is that the relative lengths intercepted along the three
principal axes of the crystal, by the various faces other than those of
the fundamental form, the faces of which are parallel to the axes, are
expressed by the simplest unit integers, 1, 2, 3, or 4, the latter being
rarely exceeded and then only corresponding to very small and altogether
secondary faces.
This discovery impressed Haüy with the immense influence which the
structure of the crystal substance exerts on the external form, and how,
in fact, it determines that form. For the observations were only to be
explained on the supposition that the crystal was built up of structural
units, which he imagined to be miniature crystals shaped like the
fundamental form, and that the faces were dependent on the step-like
arrangement possible to the exterior of such an assemblage. This brought
him inevitably to the intimate relation which cleavage must bear to such
a structure, that it really determined the shape of, and was the
expression of the nature of, the structural units. Thus, before the
conception of the atomic theory by Dalton, whose first paper (read 23rd
October 1803), was published in the year 1803 in the Proceedings of the
Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, two years after the
publication of Haüy’s last work (his “Traité de Minéralogie,” Paris,
1801), Haüy came to the conclusion that crystals were composed of units
which he termed “_Molécules Intégrantes_,” each of which comprised the
whole chemical compound, a sort of gross chemical molecule. Moreover, he
went still further in his truly original insight, for he actually
suggested that the _molécules intégrantes_ were in turn composed of
“_Molécules Elémentaires_,” representing the simple matter of the
elementary substances composing the compound, and hinted further that
these elementary portions had properly orientated positions within the
_molécules intégrantes_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account