Some very interesting evidence of the validity of their fundamental
assumption of spheres of influence of the component atoms as the
ultimate structural units is brought forward. They show that there are
two modes of closely packing equal spheres, which give rise respectively
to a cubic and a hexagonal crystal structure, the latter having a
specific axial ratio of the vertical to the three equal equatorial
horizontal axes; and that the chemical elements which are solids and
crystallise, and the structural units of which can naturally be assumed
to be equal spheres, being those of the similar atoms of the same
chemical element, do practically all crystallise either in the cubic
system or in the hexagonal system with the specific axial ratio
indicated by them. The theory as it concerns chemical valency is
obviously not affected by these interesting facts, as the spheres of
influence present are those of the identically similar atoms of the same
element. But the theory has received considerable support from the
results of the investigation of a number of carbon compounds, chiefly
derivatives of benzene.
Thus, in spite of the very wise decision of Barlow at the time of
developing his theory of the homogeneous partitioning of space, to keep
quite clear of attributing shape to the structural unit atoms or
molecules, and to consider them as points, he, in common with the other
contributors to that splendid geometrical work, appears driven to
consider the question of shape when, in collaboration with his chemical
colleague, he endeavours to apply his geometrical results to the
practical problems of chemistry. It may be inevitable that we cannot get
away from the idea of shape of the fundamental structural units. Yet the
moment we do admit the idea, and begin to talk of polyhedra, or even of
spheres, in close or any other packing, we enter the debatable land,
concerning which the experimental evidence is as yet but shadowy and
liable to many interpretations. Hence it is that we have the
parallelohedra of Von Fedorow, having volumes proportional to the
molecular volumes, the more general plane-faced cell of fourteen faces,
the tetrakaidecahedron of Lord Kelvin and its deformed derivatives, and
now the polyhedra of Pope and Barlow. The more indefinite
“Fundamentalbereich” of Schönflies appears to be left behind, and we
have embarked on a definite course of attributing shape to the component
atoms or their regions of influence in the crystal structure. Von
Fedorow has developed his particular theory in a very masterly manner,
and with the aid of it professes, and with very considerable success in
many cases, to determine the correct mode of setting up a crystal for
truly comparative descriptive purposes, and has derived therefrom a
remarkable method of crystallochemical analysis.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account