Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriagesScott, Robert P. (Robert Pittis)
History
Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriages
Scott, Robert P. (Robert Pittis)
Bicycles; Cycling; Tricycles
Take first the differences between a modern ordinary bicycle and the
old velocipede, or “bone-shaker,” so called. The former is lighter
and better made; but the one great difference is that the rider is
more nearly over his work. It was this one advance which encouraged
the development of other minor differences which had been roughly
thought out before. In fact, the Patent Office shows that many of these
improvements were on record, but there would have been little use for
them if the rider had not worked himself up into a place where he could
do something. Just who raised him up from a midway position between
the two wheels, the saddle seventy-five degrees back of the vertical
through the drive-wheel axle, as in the old bone-shaker, to nearly the
top of the forward wheel, working at an angle of thirty degrees, as in
some ordinaries, we will not attempt to say; but when he got there he
has been willing, for a long time at least, to try to stay there, even
at the expense of frequently going _down_ on the other side, much to
his annoyance, particularly as the general construction of the thing
compelled him to go down the other end up, which end nature did not
intend for terrestrial impact. It may as well be stated just here,
however, that when our rider raised and moved his saddle forward he
would have gone clear up to the vertical had it not been that it was
absolutely impossible for him to stay there at all without hanging a
heavy counter-balance somewhere in the neighborhood of the rear wheel,
a scheme which, by the way, has been really recommended in modern cycle
history.
One excuse for dwelling upon the foregoing dissertation is that many
casual observers and some riders, strange as it may seem, assert that
in the development of the modern rear-driving Rover pattern, we have
been retrograding to the old velocipede, whereas, in fact, we have made
another step forward of a similar nature to that spoken of before in
raising the rider up above the point of application of power. In the
Rover machine we have landed the rider practically where, as before
said, he could not remain at all before; but in this new machine he has
gained the advantage of being able to stay there.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account