Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriages — John Shaqi
Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriagesScott, Robert P. (Robert Pittis)
History
Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriages
Scott, Robert P. (Robert Pittis)
Bicycles; Cycling; Tricycles
Thus our rider has been gradually getting up and over the work.
Various devices have been used in order to facilitate this operation,
but, unfortunately for our power-development theory, many of the
changes have been coupled with the safety feature so prominently that,
in efforts by makers to place the rider in the best possible position
for work, the safety feature is all that the casual observer has been
able to see; therefore it is that in several machines, such as that
called the “Extraordinary Challenge,” the sales have been made more on
the strength of safety than on their other great point of real merit,
the advantage in power. In such machines, the rider has often been
surprised to find that he had more power than he supposed, but having
bought his mount with a view to safety, and it being still found to
contain almost as great an element of risk as he before incurred,
considerable disfavor has been the result. Had the element of increased
power been thoroughly understood and appreciated, such machines would,
in spite of the great deterioration in appearance, have been regarded
more kindly.
No better illustration in other arts of the desire and tendency of the
operator to get over his work can be had than in that of the ordinary
foot-lathe. No maker of lathes would think of attaching a treadle in
such a manner that the workman could not perch himself directly over
it. In some experiments on foot-lathes, the writer found that he could
run at a given speed and resistance three times as long when over the
work as when standing some twelve inches back and he had to reach out
for it; in fact, it seems quite evident that our theoretical conclusion
is fully established in actual practice.
Granting then that the direct vertical application of power by the
rider is a desirable acquisition, let it be called a fundamental
requirement. It must not, however, be supposed, in this connection,
that the foregoing in any way justifies the swimming position, or
kicking back, which some experimenters have of late been prone to
adopt. We must approach but never get beyond the vertical limit.
Since this manuscript has been ready for the publisher, articles in
the _Bicycling News_ by “Warrior” and “Semi-Racer” have come under my
notice, from which I clip sections, appertaining to this subject, as
follows:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account