Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriagesScott, Robert P. (Robert Pittis)
History
Cycling art, energy, and locomotion : $b A series of remarks on the development of bicycles, tricycles, and man-motor carriages
Scott, Robert P. (Robert Pittis)
Bicycles; Cycling; Tricycles
In answer to the idea advanced that the fault is due to the mere size
of the wheel,—that a large one has more surface exposed to contact,
etc., and will hold better,—the writer has noticed very little
difference in his thirty-eight-inch narrow-tread front-driving pattern
as compared with a fifty-two-inch Ordinary; if there is any difference
caused by the size of the wheel, this fourteen inches ought to have
shown itself more than it did.
If the small wheel in a bicycle is a cause for slipping, we could
naturally ask why it does not show itself more in the rear wheel of the
Ordinary. It may be said, in answer to this, that there is but little
weight on it, and that, not being a driver, whatever capers it might
choose to cut are ignored by its regal, imperturbable leader; hence, if
the rear wheel slips, it is immediately drawn up in line again. Another
plea is that the lack of weight on the front wheel of the Safety makes
it slip, and then it carries the rear wheel with it. To the last I can
simply reply, as I would to the _Cyclist’s_ notion of the slanting
fork, that it is the rear wheel which slips first, last, and all the
time, or else a large majority of riders are very much misled, and
really can’t tell what is going on under them. Certainly we must say
that if appearances and sensations of the riders are worth anything,
the doctrine of the front wheel slipping first must go to the wall
and carry several ingenious solutions with it. Still another bright
speculation is, that the unusual bumping of the front wheel holds it
back, and the rear pushing on, for the nonce, cannot go forward, hence
it must go sideways.
If we admit that the American Star does not slip, then the theories of
small weight on the front wheel, the slanting fork, and front bumper
must all go for naught. There are some other qualifications, however,
which would modify or exclude the Star as a reference. The fork is
slanting to a greater extent than in any other machine, but the small
front steerer is swung from a point directly above the centre, which,
it is said, gives the wheel a better chance to caster. To our ingenious
front-bumper friend, I would also suggest the trial of a first-class
anti-vibrator to the fork, which will let it spring back a good way.
And again, it has been stated, in regard to the Rover slip, that the
large rear wheel swings from side to side, or wabbles, humorously
likened by some to the wagging of a duck’s tail. This feeling of
disturbance in the rear part of the machine is felt in the Ordinary
when supplied with the large rear wheel advocated by some, and it may
have something to do with the slip, though it is hardly possible that
it would in the well-built, steady machines of the present time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account