I cannot think of any better way of explaining the effect of Dürer's Art
as an illustrator upon his time, than to beg you to imagine the delight
a short-sighted man experiences when he is given his first pair of
spectacles. Everything remains where it is; he has not lost his sense of
orientation, but on a sudden he sees everything more clearly, more
defined, more in detail: and where he previously had only recognised
vague effects he begins to see their causes. Such was the effect of
Dürer's Art: features, arms, hands, bodies, legs, feet, draperies,
accessories, tree-trunks and foliage, vistas, radiance and light, not
suggested but present, truly realised. When I say Dürer was not
imaginative I mean to convey that imagination was characteristic of the
age, not of him alone, but the materialisation, the realisation of
fancy, that is his strength.
All these considerations can find, unfortunately, no room for discussion
in these pages, for it were tedious to refer the reader to examples
which are not illustrated.
We must perforce accept the limitations of our programme, and devote our
attention to his paintings--far the least significant part of his
activity.
Dürer was the great master of line--he thinks in line. This line is
firstly the outline or contour in its everyday meaning; secondly, it is
the massed army of lines that go to make shadow; thirdly, it is line in
its psychical aspect, as denoting direction, aim, tendency, such as we
have it in the print of the "Melancholia." No one before him had ever
performed such wonderful feats with "line," not even Mantegna with his
vigorous but repellent parallels.
This line was the greatest obstacle to his becoming a successful
painter. For his line was not the great sweep, not the graceful flow,
not the spontaneous dash, not the slight touch, but the heavy,
determined, reasoned move, as of a master-hand in a game of chess.
To him, consequently, the world and his Art were problems, not joys.
Consider one of his early works--the portrait of his father, the honest,
God-fearing, struggling goldsmith. The colour of this work is
monotonous, a sort of gold-russet. It might almost be a monochrome, for
the interest is centred in the wrinkles and lines of care and old age
with which Father Time had furrowed the skin of the old man, and which
Dürer has imitated with the determination of a ploughshare cleaving the
glebe.
[Illustration: PLATE VI.--THE MADONNA WITH THE SISKIN
(From the Oil-painting in the Berlin Museum. Painted about 1506)
Although this picture shows that it was painted under Venetian
influence, it betrays the unrest of Dürer's mind, which makes nearly all
his work pleasanter to look _into_ than to look _at_. Dürer's works
generally should be _read_].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account