Daedalus : $b or, Science and the future — John Shaqi
Daedalus : $b or, Science and the futureHaldane, J. B. S. (John Burdon Sanderson)
Philosophy
Daedalus : $b or, Science and the future
Haldane, J. B. S. (John Burdon Sanderson)
Biology; Science
Ever since the time of Berkeley it has been customary for the majority
of metaphysicians to proclaim the ideality of Time, of Space, or
of both. But they soon made it clear that in spite of this, time
would continue to wait for no man, and space to separate lovers.
The only practical consequence that they generally drew was that
their own ethical and political views were somehow inherent in the
structure of the universe. The experimental proof or disproof of such
deductions is difficult, and--if the late war may be regarded as an
experimental disproof of certain of Hegel’s political tenets--costly
and unsatisfactory.
Einstein, so far from deducing a new decalogue, has contented himself
with deducing the consequences to space and time themselves of their
ideality. These are mostly too small to be measurable, but some, such
as the deflection of light by the sun’s gravitational field, are
susceptible of verification, and have been verified. The majority of
scientific men are now being constrained by the evidence of these
experiments to adopt a very extreme form of Kantian idealism. The
Kantian _Ding-an-sich_ is an eternal four-dimensional manifold,
which we perceive as space and time, but what we regard as space and
what as time is more or less fortuitous.
It is perhaps interesting to speculate on the practical consequences
of Einstein’s discovery. I do not doubt that he will be believed. A
prophet who can give signs in the heavens is always believed. No one
ever seriously questioned Newton’s theory after the return of Halley’s
comet. Einstein has told us that space, time, and matter are shadows
of the fifth dimension, and the heavens have declared his glory. In
consequence Kantian idealism will become the basal working hypothesis
of the physicist and finally of all educated men, just as materialism
did after Newton’s day. We may not call ourselves materialists, but
we do interpret the activities of the moon, the Thames, influenza,
and aeroplanes in terms of matter. Our ancestors did not, nor, in
all probability, will our descendants. The materialism (whether
conscious or subconscious does not very much matter) of the last
few generations has led to various results of practical importance,
such as sanitation, Marxian socialism, and the right of an accused
person to give evidence on his or her own behalf. The reign of Kantian
idealism as the basal working hypothesis, first of physics, and then
of every-day life, will in all probability last for some centuries. At
the end of that time a similar step in advance will be taken. Einstein
showed that experience cannot be interpreted in terms of space and
time. This was a well-known fact, but so long as space and time did not
break down in their own special sphere, that of explaining the facts
of motion, physicists continued to believe in them, or at any rate,
what was much more important, to think in terms of them for practical
purposes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account