Darwin, and After Darwin, Volume 3 of 3: Post-Darwinian Questions: Isolation and Physiological SelectionRomanes, George John
Science
Darwin, and After Darwin, Volume 3 of 3: Post-Darwinian Questions: Isolation and Physiological Selection
Romanes, George John
Evolution (Biology); Heredity
I went as far as I could, perhaps too far, in agreement with Wagner
[i. e. in the last edition of the _Origin of Species_]; since that
time I have seen no reason to change my mind; but then I must add
that my attention has been absorbed on other subjects[38].
[38] _Life and Letters_, vol. iii. p. 159.
And he seems to have ended by still failing to perceive that the
explanation which he gives of "divergence of character" in the _Origin
of Species_, can only hold on the unexpressed assumption that free
intercrossing is in some way prevented at the commencement, and
throughout the development, of each diverging type.
Lastly, we have to consider Darwin's opinion touching the important
principle of "Independent Variability." This, it will be remembered, is
the principle which ensures that when a portion (not too large) of a
species is prevented from interbreeding with the rest of the species,
sooner or later a divergence of type will result, owing to the fact that
the average qualities of the separated portion at the time of its
separation cannot have been exactly the same as the average qualities of
the specific type as a whole. Thus the state of Amixia, being a state of
what Mr. Gulick calls Independent Generation, will of itself--i.e. even
if unassisted by natural selection--induce divergence of type, in a
ratio that has been mathematically calculated by Delbœuf.
Darwin wrote thus to Professor Weismann in 1872:--
I have now read your essay with very great interest. Your view of
the origin of local races through "Amixia" is altogether new to me,
and seems to throw an important light on an obscure question[39].
[39] _Life and Letters_, vol. iii. p. 155.
And in the last edition of the _Variation of Animals and Plants_ he adds
the following paragraph:--
This view may throw some light on the fact that the domestic
animals which formerly inhabited the several districts in Great
Britain, and the half-wild cattle lately kept in several British
parks, differed slightly from one another; for these animals were
prevented from wandering over the whole country and intercrossing,
but would have crossed freely within each district or park[40].
[40] _Variation_, &c., vol. ii. p. 262.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account