Darwinism. The Noachian Flood: A lecture delivered before the Torquay Natural History Society, Jan. 31st, 1870Stebbing, Thomas Roscoe Rede
Religion
Darwinism. The Noachian Flood: A lecture delivered before the Torquay Natural History Society, Jan. 31st, 1870
Stebbing, Thomas Roscoe Rede
Deluge; Evolution; Natural selection
It might be asked how, with the supernatural knowledge requisite for
collecting all the terrestrial animals of the globe, and the unique
opportunity for observation afforded by a residence of some months with
them in the ark, no more scientific classification was arrived at than
that into birds and beasts and creeping things? But letting this pass,
or scattering it and other objections to the winds by inventing a miracle
to explain the gathering together of the animals, we shall then have to
give some account of their re-distribution. Instead of worrying
ourselves with the problem, shall we at once solve it by asserting that
they were miraculously re-transferred to the habitations from which they
came? This will be a highly satisfactory plan, if only it will stop the
mouths of those inquisitive persons who never know when they are beaten
in an argument. But one cavil may easily be foreseen, requiring a new
miracle to satisfy it; for many of the animals must either have been
miraculously supplied with provisions, or miraculously enabled to do
without them; or else, to take a single instance, two spiders would have
been limited to a couple of flies, and when the flies had become extinct,
because devoured by the spiders, the spiders also would have become
extinct through having no more flies to devour; and thus their
preservation in the ark, at the expense of a great many unrecorded and
highly improbable miracles, would have been utterly useless.
Suppose, however, that they were spread over the earth again by the slow
process of natural distribution. Certain perplexities, indeed, may have
arisen when they first issued from the ark, when the cobra and the
rattlesnake, the hungry wolf and the relentless tiger were let loose upon
the impoverished world and its defenceless inhabitants. For at that
conjuncture to have destroyed even one cruel and venomous beast might
have blotted out a whole species. It is surely a little remarkable that
ravenous beasts and birds of prey should have been limited, even while in
the ark, to feeding upon animals in a ceremonial or ecclesiastical sense
clean; but if, after they had left the ark, and had once more to provide
for themselves, the wily panther and the treacherous hyena must be
imagined debating before every meal whether their victim belonged to the
sevens of the clean or the couples of the unclean animals, shall we not
turn in pity and vexation from any view that involves and admits so
monstrous a supposition?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account