Daybreak in Turkey: Second EditionBarton, James L. (James Levi)
History
Daybreak in Turkey: Second Edition
Barton, James L. (James Levi)
Turkey
It was soon found, however, that the ancient Armenian, the language
of all the manuscripts of the Bible and rituals of the Old Church and
also of the Bibles and Testaments recently printed, was not understood
by the common, uneducated people. As the educated were few, the number
of intelligent readers was greatly limited. This number was confined
practically to the higher clergy, a few priests and vartabeds, and
the teachers in the schools. In order to reach the common people,
the Russian Bible Society issued in 1822 and 1823 a New Testament
translated into Turkish and printed with the Armenian character. As
a large proportion of the Armenians understood Turkish this version
brought to them the Word of God.
Hitherto the Armenian ecclesiastics had made little or no opposition
to the circulation of the Bible among the people, while some of the
most prominent seemed to favor the work. In 1823 the agents of the
British and Foreign Bible Society at Constantinople endeavored to
secure the sanction of the Armenian patriarch for the printing and
circulation of the New Testament in the modern, spoken Armenian tongue,
the home language of most of the Armenians in Turkey. They were met
with the severest opposition, and with threats of prohibiting the
reading of the book if it should be issued.
Without attempting to follow the course of Bible publication, upon
which depended the plan of reform for both the Armenian and Greek
churches as well as for all the other races dwelling in the empire,
suffice it to say that the hostility of the Armenian clergy, called
forth by the publication of the modern Armenian version of the
Scriptures, started a conflict, which waged throughout the country
for more than a generation, as to whether that version was the true
Word of God. The ancient Armenian Scriptures were translated from
the Septuagint and the Latin Vulgate while the modern versions were
made from the Hebrew and Greek. For this reason there were many
discrepancies between the two versions which were discussed everywhere.
This drove the people to a careful study of the Bible. If it could
be once established that the modern version was also the “Word of
God,” there could be no hesitation upon the part of the Armenians in
accepting it as such. This phase of the controversy passed fully forty
years ago, and throughout the country this version is now accepted as
_Astvadsashoonch_ or the _veritable Word of God_. It was, however, for
many years a vital question which commanded the attention and energy of
the strongest men of the race.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account