Bible -- Antiquities; Bible. Old Testament -- Evidences, authority, etc.
So also for the murrain on the cattle, and the boils on the Egyptians.
None of Israel were affected by these disasters. Did Moses have some
kind of salve or prophylactic serum that he used, he being the great
medical genius that this article makes him to be? Even that will not
account for the fact that when the hail came, it, also, avoided the camp
of Moses and his three and a half million compatriots!
But even a great medical genius and an accomplished meteorologist could
not have foreseen the coming of the locusts that darkened the sky and
the land as well. Nor could this great medical genius, even had he also
been an able entomologist, have seen to it that the locusts ate only
Egyptian vegetation, as Goshen greenery would have been just as
acceptable to _hungry_ locusts! And who ever saw any other kind?
Passing over the supernatural darkness with the simple observation that
it was _not_ an ordinary phenomenon such as a sandstorm (which left the
houses of the Israelites unaffected), we will hasten to the conclusion
of the matter, the death of the first-born. The article we are quoting
makes a terribly strained attempt to prove that others died as well as
the first-born, but the text of the Scripture does not so state or
imply. Indeed, the text very clearly sets forth the fact that it was
only the first-born who died. They died dramatically; all at the same
hour.
At midnight, simultaneously, death smote a certain restricted class.
The prince in the palace, and the felon in the dungeon; the cattle as
well.
_But the first-born of Israel did not die!
They were all under the blood!_
Quaint epidemic, was it not? It came as a result of disease germs in the
river Nile, it killed all its victims out of just one class, the
first-born, and it passed over any home that had lamb’s blood on the
door posts!
Is it necessary for a man to believe such arrant nonsense, and accept
such utterances of folly before he can qualify as an educated man, or a
scientist?
Most fortunately, it is not!
To show the truth of this matter, we can indeed study these ten plagues
in the light of modern science. Not by the flickering rays of the lamp
of human speculation can understanding be achieved. Only in the full
illumination of the sunshine of historical fact can the truth be
discerned. So, we will turn to the great and truly modern science of
archeology to study the Ten Plagues of Egypt, and see what the truth of
the matter really is.
In the first place, thanks to the vast amount of research in the
archeology of Egypt, we now know that these ten plagues were a contest
between the Lord God of the Israelites, and the pantheon of Egypt.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account