Deadly Adulteration and Slow Poisoning Unmasked: Disease and Death in the Pot and BottleAnonymous
Science
Deadly Adulteration and Slow Poisoning Unmasked: Disease and Death in the Pot and Bottle
Anonymous
Drug adulteration; Food adulteration and inspection
When one views this goodly enumeration of items, it must be admitted
that the burthen of the old song does not appear overcharged:
“One glass of drink, I got by chance,
’Twas claret when it was in France,
But now from it moche wider;
I think a man might make as good
With green crabbes, boil’d in Brazil-wood,
And half a pinte of cyder.”
And it gives us cause to be satisfied of the truth of Milton’s remark:—
“Of deaths, many are the ways that lead
To his grim cave—all dismal.”
O ye gulled Jacky Bulls, who revel in bibbing “costly French wines,”
how angry you will be with me when I tell you that while you think
you are sipping “Genuine Sparkling Champagne,” you are titillating
your exquisite gullets with merely plain home-made English gooseberry
wine; or, what may be more alarming to you, with worthless Champagne
wine of very dangerous and deleterious quality and tendency; whose
effervescence or sparkling is produced by disengaging the carbonic
acid of the wine by the agency of sugar. To gain this end, the solid
sugar is corked up in the bottle, so that the disengaged gas is
retained under the pressure of the cork, ready to fly out whenever
it is removed. The agency of litharge of lead, in its worst form, is
often invoked in the manufacture of Champagne, as well as of other
white wines, in order to correct and render bright such wines as
have turned vapid, foul, or ropy, or to prevent the progress of any
ascescent quality that they may have acquired. The least pernicious
mode of manufacture of this wine is by adding to the spoiled
Champagnes, a portion of the low, or “third quality” wines from the
indifferent vineyards, and occasioning the admixture to undergo a fresh
fermentation, by the action of strong chemical agents; and then it is
vended as “_prime_ still Champagne.”
Some estimate may be formed of the extent of the adulteration of this
costly wine by the following notice in Dr. Reece’s Monthly Gazette of
Health for 1829.—“A company of Frenchmen,” says that honest abominator
of roguery and quackery of all kinds, “have contracted with some
farmers in Herefordshire for a considerable quantity of the fresh juice
of certain pears, which is to be sent to them in London, immediately
after it has been expressed, or before fermentation has commenced. With
the recently expressed juice they made last year an excellent brisk
wine resembling the finest sparkling Champagne; and we are told that
the speculation was so productive, that they have resolved to extend
their manufactory.” To this account I can, from a knowledge of the
concern, perfectly assent, except that the Anglo-French manufacture
does not exactly represent the first quality of Champagne wine, as it
is quite impossible for any imitative preparation to represent that
quality of wine.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account