Decadence: Henry Sidgwick memorial lecture, 1908Balfour, Arthur James
Philosophy
Decadence: Henry Sidgwick memorial lecture, 1908
Balfour, Arthur James
Nationalism; Political science
But if the proposition I am defending may be wrongly criticised, it
is still more likely to be wrongly praised. To some it will commend
itself as a eulogy on an industrial as distinguished from a military
civilisation: as a suggestion that in the peaceful pursuit of wealth
there is that which of itself may constitute a valuable social tonic.
This may be true, but it is not my contention. In talking of the
alliance between industry and science my emphasis is at least as much
on the word science as on the word industry. I am not concerned now
with the proportion of the population devoted to productive labour,
or the esteem in which they are held. It is on the effects which I
believe are following, and are going in yet larger measure to follow,
from the intimate relation between scientific discovery and industrial
efficiency, that I most desire to insist.
Do you then, it will be asked, so highly rate the utilitarian aspect
of research as to regard it as a source, not merely of material
convenience, but of spiritual elevation? Is it seriously to be ranked
with religion and patriotism as an important force for raising men’s
lives above what is small, personal, and self-centred? Does it not
rather pervert pure knowledge into a new contrivance for making money,
and give a fresh triumph to the ‘growing materialism of the age’?
I do not myself believe that this age is either less spiritual or more
sordid than its predecessors. I believe, indeed, precisely the reverse.
But however this may be, is it not plain that if a society is to be
moved by the remote speculations of isolated thinkers it can only
be on condition that their isolation is not complete? Some point of
contact they must have with the world in which they live, and if their
influence is to be based on widespread sympathy, the contact must be
in a region where there can be, if not full mutual comprehension, at
least a large measure of practical agreement and willing co-operation.
Philosophy has never touched the mass of men except through religion.
And, though the parallel is not complete, it is safe to say that
science will never touch them unaided by its practical applications.
Its wonders may be catalogued for purposes of education, they may be
illustrated by arresting experiments, by numbers and magnitudes which
startle or fatigue the imagination; but they will form no familiar
portion of the intellectual furniture of ordinary men unless they be
connected, however remotely, with the conduct of ordinary life. Critics
have made merry over the naive self-importance which represented
man as the centre and final cause of the universe, and conceived the
stupendous mechanism of nature as primarily designed to satisfy his
wants and minister to his entertainment. But there is another, and an
opposite, danger into which it is possible to fall. The material world,
howsoever it may have gained in sublimity, has, under the touch of
science, lost (so to speak) in domestic charm.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account