Deductions from the World WarFreytag-Loringhoven, Hugo Friedrich Philipp Johann, Freiherr von
History
Deductions from the World War
Freytag-Loringhoven, Hugo Friedrich Philipp Johann, Freiherr von
Germany. Heer; War; World War, 1914-1918
In 1914, on the other hand, this condition was completely satisfied:
at the beginning, the war was extremely popular in Russia. Moreover,
the Russian army had learnt much from the Manchurian campaign, both
as regards organisation and also as regards strategy and tactics. It
had been systematically organised and prepared for the war against
Germany and Austria-Hungary. Nevertheless, the defects in the
political organism of the Empire and in the national character could
not be remedied in a decade. Kuropatkin expressed his conviction
that, in a war against Germany and Austria-Hungary, Russia would
certainly in the first instance be defeated. Only with time did he
hope for a turn of the tide, thanks to the inexhaustibleness of
Russia's reserves of men. His respect for the superiority of German
training led Kuropatkin, when he was Minister of War, to declare that
a war of conquest against Germany would be a calamity for the Russian
Empire. The World War, no less than the March revolution of the
present year, though in a different sense, has revealed that Russia
was not really ripe for universal military service. Had it been
otherwise, we and our allies might have been unable to defend
ourselves against envelopment by overwhelmingly superior numbers.
More than once did the Austro-Hungarian army threaten to succumb
before the far superior numbers of the Russian forces. At the
beginning, the Austro-Hungarian army proved not strong enough to
defeat the main body of the Russian forces in Galicia. Certainly the
troops showed no lack of heroic self-sacrifice, and the engagements
of August and September, 1914, furnished signal instances of the
splendid courage of the army of the Dual Monarchy, which was in fact
filled with glowing enthusiasm for this contest of giants.
Naturally, in view of the mixture of races comprised in the Dual
Monarchy, it could not be kindled through and through with a common
ardour to the same degree as the German army. Such a unity of
sentiment as existed with us was impossible in its case. The
Austro-Hungarian military leaders had to cope with difficulties
arising from the mixture of races comprised in their forces,
difficulties which did not exist in the case of ourselves or our
opponents. Moreover, these brave troops had to suffer for the sins
and omissions of which the Parliaments of the Monarchy had been
guilty during past decades. The army was too weak in numbers, and
equipped with far too insufficient an artillery, to enable it to
resist successfully the Russian hordes and at the same time to cope
with the Serbians. The weakness of their regimental cadres in time
of peace had rendered impossible the training for actual
battle-tactics. This fact was bound to result in a certain lack of
unity and cohesion in the larger units.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account