Deductions from the World WarFreytag-Loringhoven, Hugo Friedrich Philipp Johann, Freiherr von
History
Deductions from the World War
Freytag-Loringhoven, Hugo Friedrich Philipp Johann, Freiherr von
Germany. Heer; War; World War, 1914-1918
Notwithstanding the decisive importance of the moral factor, we must
not fail to appreciate the great significance of technical science in
the present War as regards the effectiveness of weapons, protection
against these weapons, organisation of transport and intelligence
services, and also aërial warfare. It could not reveal itself fully
until this War. In peace we had rather suspected than actually
realised it, for any testing of it on a large scale, let alone on
such an enormous scale as the World War has witnessed, was out of the
question. The Russo-Japanese War did not reveal it to anything like
the same extent; hence the instruction which that war furnished could
give but a feeble conception of what might be expected in the sphere
of technical science. Moreover, in the decade following upon the
Manchurian campaign, technical science underwent an increasingly
rapid development.
The importance of railways as an instrument of war was early
recognised by Moltke. He always kept an eye on their development.
Up to the beginning of the World War, the mobilisation of the German
forces by rail in 1870 was looked upon as a phenomenal achievement,
and rightly so, when we consider the very meagre development of our
railway system at that date. Nevertheless, at that time less than
half a million Germans had to be dispatched to the frontier, as
compared with something like one-and-a-half millions in the year
1914. Also the transports within the Empire after the mobilisation
were more than three times as numerous as those of 1870. Moreover,
the transfers of troops during the operations themselves, which in
1870-71 took place on both sides in France, appear insignificant by
the side of those effected during the World War. In the separate
theatres of war movements of transports have been constantly
effected, and at the same time the railways have been utilised for
manœuvring purposes. The one-time notion which attributed a
certain rigidity to railways as compared with progress on foot,
because the latter could be deflected at a moment's notice in any
desired direction, has now lost much of its force. In spite of the
rigidity of the railway tracks, we have always contrived to dispatch
the transports in accordance with the requirements of the military
command. Whole armies have been transferred from one theatre of war
to another, as was essential for the Central Powers in a war
conducted on several fronts. Previous wars have, of course, from
time to time, furnished instances of a similar utilisation of
railways, for instance the American Civil War, and the War of 1866,
in which strong contingents of the Austrian Southern Army were
dispatched over the Alps to the Danube and back again to the north of
Italy. When in 1866, after Königgrätz, we were threatened with the
intervention of France, Moltke contemplated the transport of the
Prussian troops in Moravia to the Rhine. Nevertheless, as regards
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account