Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920Crowell, Benedict
History
Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920
Crowell, Benedict
United States. Army. American Expeditionary Forces -- Demobilization; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
There was no need for the Ordnance Department during the demobilization
to exercise so much care looking to the future production of artillery
carriages, and for the reason mentioned, that the manufacture of
carriages was easier than the manufacture of guns and recuperators.
Carriages can be produced with machinery essentially the same as that
used in making motor trucks, street cars, and other heavy vehicles.
Consequently, the War Department contented itself with reserving enough
machinery to equip at Rock Island Arsenal a model carriage-building
department large enough to maintain the existing reserves of artillery
and to experiment with new designs. This plant can now manufacture
every month one hundred carriages for the lighter field artillery--for
the 75’s, the 4.7’s, and the 155’s, both howitzers and guns. In
addition, at Rock Island have been concentrated jigs, fixtures,
gauges, and special tools used by the war factories, this equipment
being boxed, catalogued, and ready for instant shipment to commercial
factories that may be called upon to build artillery carriages in a
hurry. No machine tools used in carriage building, however, have been
retained.
The same economic, military, and business reasons that influenced the
post-armistice production of guns and recuperators, controlled also
the closing down of the carriage plants. There was a considerable
production of field artillery carriages after the immediate military
need for them had passed.
The artillery war orders called for the production of about 20,000
complete units, a unit being a gun, recuperator, carriage, and
accompanying limbers and caissons. The total production attributable
to the war was 6,663 complete units, produced about half before the
armistice and half afterwards. The value of this _matériel_, together
with the semi-finished components retained, was about $300,000,000.
After the armistice the General Staff adopted the policy that in the
demobilization sufficient mobile field artillery should be retained
to equip an army of twenty divisions--800,000 men--with reserves to
take care of battle wastage over a period of six months, during which
interval a new artillery industry would be brought into existence. It
is interesting to note how completely the Ordnance Department met this
policy. Including the 6,000 field guns brought back by the American
Expeditionary Forces (this figure not including captured _matériel_),
the Army now has an equipment of about 10,000 artillery units.[7] The
staff plan indicates 2,583 as the proper number of 75-millimeter guns
to be in reserve: the Army actually possesses 6,000. The projected
army of twenty divisions needs 986 155-millimeter howitzers: the
War Department owns 2,171. The projected force should have 976
155-millimeter guns: the Army to-day owns 993. These liberal margins
obtain throughout the range of mobile field guns.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account