Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920Crowell, Benedict
History
Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920
Crowell, Benedict
United States. Army. American Expeditionary Forces -- Demobilization; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
The dimensions of the whole camp were tremendous. There was nothing
like it in the United States. A man could walk briskly for an hour in a
single direction at Le Mans and see nothing but tents, barracks, drill
fields, and troops lined up for preliminary or final inspections. The
task of feeding this city full of guests was so great that the camp
administration found it economical to build a narrow-gauge railroad
system connecting the kitchens with the warehouses. Food moved up
to the camp cookstoves by the trainload, and the same locomotives
that brought the supplies hauled away the refuse. A whole adjacent
forest was cut down to supply firewood. When the Americans occupied
the section there were no adequate switching facilities, nor were
there storage accommodations. The Quartermaster Corps, which operated
the storage project, cleared a field in the midst of a wood and used
the clearing for an open storage space (the surrounding trees giving
a degree of shelter), connecting the place with the railroad by
constructing a spur track. Thereafter, even after great warehouses had
been built in the clearing and it had become the supply depot for the
entire camp, requiring the services of 6,000 troops in its operation,
the place was known to the camp as “The Spur.” As an addition to this
storage, smaller covered warehouses were provided at all the divisional
sub-depots. At one time the corrals of the camp contained 10,000 horses
and mules. In one week in February, 1919, nearly 32,000 troops arrived
in camp, a fact indicating the rate at which troops passed through
to embarkation. The Quartermaster Corps opened two great central
commissaries that were in effect department stores. The camp operated a
large laundry, a shoe repair shop, a clothing repair shop, and numerous
other industrial plants.
The equipment installed at Le Mans was duplicated in smaller scale at
the three embarkation ports. Yet even these port installations could
not be called small. Camp Pontanezen at Brest could give accommodations
to 80,000 men at once. The largest embarkation camps in the United
States were smaller than this. There were thirteen smaller camps and
military posts at Brest. The two embarkation camps at Bordeaux could
house 22,000 men, but there were billeting accommodations in the
district for thousands of others. The construction at St. Nazaire was
considerably larger than that at Bordeaux, but not so extensive as that
at Brest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account