Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920 — John Shaqi
Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920Crowell, Benedict
History
Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920
Crowell, Benedict
United States. Army. American Expeditionary Forces -- Demobilization; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
Most of these camps were built after the armistice, and the engineer
constructors and the embarking troops elbowed each other as embarkation
and construction proceeded simultaneously. Some of the camps had served
as rest camps prior to the armistice, but these had to be greatly
enlarged and improved in equipment before they could give adequate
service as embarkation camps. The weather along the northwestern coast
of France is intensely uncomfortable and disagreeable to Americans.
In the winter and spring especially, the rains and mists are almost
incessant. It was not always possible to choose ideal sites for the
embarkation camps in France. The sites had to be near the ports, and in
the thickly inhabited countryside the American authorities were forced
to accept whatsoever areas they could get, without being too insistent
upon such fine points as natural drainage and pleasant surroundings.
This statement is particularly applicable to Pontanezen, which was
pitched on high but poorly drained ground. Ordinarily the Army would
not have occupied such a location without first making permanent
improvements. The continual rains, the lack of strong drainage, and
the heavy traffic of men, animals, and trucks combined to make the
Pontanezen site in 1919 a morass of quaking mud. Only the strongest of
emergencies justified its use. Because of the daily cost of maintaining
the A. E. F. and because the expeditionary soldiers themselves wished
to return home as soon as possible, regardless of the conditions of
their travel, it was decided to make use of these port camps even
while they were being constructed, instead of holding up the whole
movement until the camp arrangements could be made perfect.
Tales of suffering among our soldiers at Pontanezen came to the
United States and were even aired on the floors of Congress, but
the suffering alleged was more apparent than real. Those who went
through the experience of residence in Pontanezen, even at its worst,
were not injured in health. Despite appearances, the camp’s sanitary
arrangements were of high merit. The medical records of Camp Pontanezen
show that its sickness and death rates, leaving the domestic epidemic
of influenza altogether out of the comparison, were as low as those of
the best camps in the United States.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account