Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920Crowell, Benedict
History
Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920
Crowell, Benedict
United States. Army. American Expeditionary Forces -- Demobilization; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
The post-armistice production of airplane engines was somewhat greater,
both proportionately and in numbers of units delivered. This was due
partly to the greater momentum acquired by the engine project, partly
to the fact that engines could be stored safely and would retain good
military value for years to come, and partly to the necessity of
keeping the engine makers at work while their factories were turning to
normal production. The total American production of aviation engines
on the war contracts was as follows: deliveries to October 31, 1918,
28,509; deliveries thereafter, 13,081; total war production, 41,590. Of
these engines 20,493 were Liberty engines, of which about 5,000 were
produced after the armistice.
About 300 observation balloons were produced after the armistice before
the manufacture could be terminated.
In one important particular the policy adopted in the demobilization
of the war aircraft industry was exactly the opposite of that used
in demobilizing the ordnance industry. In working back to a peace
footing, it was the policy of the Ordnance Department to reserve
complete manufacturing equipments and to set up stand-by plants for the
manufacture of some of the most important materials in ordnance supply.
On the other hand, in demobilizing the airplane industry it was the
policy for the Government not to retain any manufacturing facilities
whatsoever. There were strong strategic reasons behind both these
policies. For field guns, for recuperators, for shell, and for other
important ordnance, there is little or no normal commercial demand;
and the only way the Ordnance Department could guarantee the future
existence of facilities for producing these materials was to retain
the equipment created during the war. But there is, or can be, some
commercial demand for airplanes, and some day there will undoubtedly
be a great commercial demand for them. It is important to the military
welfare of the United States that this country take a foremost place
in the improvement of designs and in the production of flying machines
for commercial use. Only through the development of a great independent
aircraft industry in this country can the Government be assured of the
existence of facilities upon which it can rely to give this nation
great power in the air. As conditions now are, the Government itself
must be the chief customer of the airplane industry, and on the
government orders the industry must live until commercial flying begins
to develop on a scale comparable at least to the early development of
railway transportation in the United States. If the Air Service were to
have retained the war manufacturing facilities as government producing
and stand-by plants, that act would have dealt a staggering blow to
the infant commercial industry in the most uncertain period of its
existence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account