Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920Crowell, Benedict
History
Demobilization : $b our industrial and military demobilization after the armistice, 1918-1920
Crowell, Benedict
United States. Army. American Expeditionary Forces -- Demobilization; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
Now, there is nothing quite so second-hand as second-hand building
materials. Boards are full of nail holes and sometimes covered with
faded paint or disfiguring marks. Bricks are soiled, chipped, and worn,
and conglomerated with stonelike mortar. Hardware and metallic fixtures
are corroded and rusty. Such materials are not only wreckage and
junk, but not even valuable junk. The chief cost in the construction
of a training camp was the labor which laid the brick, installed the
underground piping, smoothed, squared, and nailed up the lumber, and
soldered the joints in the plumbing. All that labor value was lost when
camps were salvaged for their materials.
Yet this was not the only loss which the Government was forced to
sustain. Practically all the camps were originally located on leased
ground; and this fact implied that in razing the camps the Government
was bound to restore the land to its original condition, or, in
lieu of that, to pay to the owners the costs of restoration. These
questions of property damage greatly complicated the demobilization
of the training camps, because the amounts of damage were so hard to
ascertain. Concrete roads had been laid across what were originally
pastures; fertile corn lands were crisscrossed with clay ridges thrown
up above the water and sewer trenches. On the other hand, some of the
camp improvements had drained former swamps and reclaimed them for
cultivation, and such benefits would offset damages in other places. It
was out of the question for the Government to attempt to settle these
thousands of cases individually, because of the time it would take;
and therefore it was stipulated that the purchasers of the camps must
assume all liabilities for property damage and hold the Government
harmless from claims that might later be pressed in the Court of
Claims. Naturally the purchasers made allowances for these damages in
their bids, and wide allowances, too, since the extent of the damages
was largely conjecture. This consideration further depressed the prices
paid by the purchasers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account