Demonologia : $b or, natural knowledge revealed; being an exposé of ancient and modern superstitions, credulity, fanaticism, enthusiasm, & imposture, as connected with the doctrine, caballa, and jargon, of amulets, apparitions, astrology, charms, demonology, devils, divination, dreams, deuteroscopia, effluvia, fatalism, fate, friars, ghosts, gipsies, hell, hypocrites, incantations, inquisition, jugglers, legends, magic, magicians, miracles, monks, nymphs, oracles, physiognomy, purgatory, predest — John Shaqi
Demonologia : $b or, natural knowledge revealed; being an exposé of ancient and modern superstitions, credulity, fanaticism, enthusiasm, & imposture, as connected with the doctrine, caballa, and jargon, of amulets, apparitions, astrology, charms, demonology, devils, divination, dreams, deuteroscopia, effluvia, fatalism, fate, friars, ghosts, gipsies, hell, hypocrites, incantations, inquisition, jugglers, legends, magic, magicians, miracles, monks, nymphs, oracles, physiognomy, purgatory, predestForsyth, J. S.
History
Demonologia : $b or, natural knowledge revealed; being an exposé of ancient and modern superstitions, credulity, fanaticism, enthusiasm, & imposture, as connected with the doctrine, caballa, and jargon, of amulets, apparitions, astrology, charms, demonology, devils, divination, dreams, deuteroscopia, effluvia, fatalism, fate, friars, ghosts, gipsies, hell, hypocrites, incantations, inquisition, jugglers, legends, magic, magicians, miracles, monks, nymphs, oracles, physiognomy, purgatory, predest
Forsyth, J. S.
Demonology; Superstition; Witchcraft
Ignorant as the Romans were of a superintending Providence, and of the
revealed will of the Divine Majesty, their trust in such omens was
pardonable, and deceived as they were by the artifices of their
soothsayers, who could contrive to _time_ their prophecies, and express
them in such a manner that they should appear to be punctually
fulfilled, we cannot wonder if the wisest among them were induced to
place confidence in imposture. But that we should be as much attached to
this species of divination is a weakness, than which there is none we
ought more to blush at. Although we boast of our superior understanding,
improved as it is by the knowledge of eighteen centuries, we are guilty
of a weakness which is excusable only in an unenlightened heathen. This
subject might, perhaps, be treated with the ridicule of satire, or the
silence of contempt, but the more we consider it, the more we should be
inclined to doubt the fact, that there can exist a human and reasonable
being so weak, as to believe that futurity can be revealed by trifling
events, or by the lowest of mankind, under the name of conjurors. But
the fact cannot be doubted: cases of the kind occur every day; and the
happiness of individuals and families often lies at the mercy of such
impostors.
Those who are addicted to this species of superstitious credulity are no
doubt of that class of people who are called _well-meaning_, and would
be greatly incensed were we to ask them whether they believed in the
superintendence of a Divine Providence. They would answer, “Surely—God
forbid we did not!” And yet, is it consistent with our received ideas,
or with the revealed wisdom and perfections of the Deity, to suppose
that he should declare that futurity is locked up from the penetration
of mankind, and yet should reveal the events of it by the sediments of a
cup of coffee, the flame of a candle, or the starting of a sulphureous
coal? Is not this offering the greatest insult to him? A step farther,
we have, indeed, gone, and but a step towards the very highest insult;
we have supposed that he makes known the secrets of futurity to the
meanest vagrants and impostors, to the men and women whom the magistrate
very properly punishes as much against their foreknowledge as against
their inclination. The impossibility of our acquiring by any means a
knowledge of future events, and the miserable condition of human life if
we had that knowledge, might be here insisted on; but they must be
obvious to every thinking man. A better dissuasive from the credulity
which is the subject of this discourse, would be to insist upon the
gross and insulting impiety of endeavouring to pry into what the Deity
has pronounced hidden and concealed, and that by agents the most mean
and contemptible. Let those who are still credulous in the appearance of
their coffee grounds, their spilling of salt, their passing under a
ladder or scaffolding[4], and all the paraphernalia of the impostures of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account