Determination of the Atomic Weight of Cadmium and the Preparation of Certain of Its Sub-CompoundsJones, Harry C. (Harry Clary)
Science
Determination of the Atomic Weight of Cadmium and the Preparation of Certain of Its Sub-Compounds
Jones, Harry C. (Harry Clary)
Atomic weights; Cadmium; Thesis (Ph. D.)
A pair of crucibles (1 and 2 in the figure) was selected and treated as
described. Another pair about the same size but a little lighter was
prepared in exactly the same way. Each pair was placed in the nickel
crucible and heated by means of the blast-lamp for half an hour.
After cooling in desiccators, both pairs of crucibles where placed in
the closed balance until no longer affected by the moisture of the
air, which was also dried by calcium chloride. The tare was brought to
within one tenth of a milligram of the weight of the crucibles against
which it was being tared, by adding fragments of porcelain obtained
from another crucible of the same composition. The difference in weight
between the tare and its mate was then accurately ascertained.
Each pair of crucibles was again placed in the nickel crucible and
blasted for half an hour. They were then reweighed, to determine if the
difference in weight previously found had remained constant. In no case
was any change detected, yet this precaution was always taken.
The Results.
The following table contains the results of ten successive
determinations.
At. Wt. Cd. At. Wt. Cd.
Wt. of Cd. Wt. of CdO. (O = 16) (O = 15.96)
I 1.77891 2.03288 112.070 111.790
II 1.82492 2.08544 112.078 111.798
III 1.74688 1.99626 112.078 111.798
IV 1.57000 1.79418 112.053 111.773
V 1.98481 2.26820 112.061 111.781
VI 2.27297 2.59751 112.059 111.779
VII 1.75695 2.00775 112.086 111.806
VIII 1.70028 1.94305 112.059 111.779
IX 1.92237 2.19679 112.083 111.803
X 1.92081 2.19502 112.078 111.798
------- ------- ------- -------
Mean, 112.0705. 111.7905.
Maximum, 112.086. 111.806.
Minimum, 112.053. 111.773.
Difference, .033. .033.
Calculating the atomic weight of cadmium from the total amount of metal
used and oxide found, we have:
At. Wt. of Cd. At. Wt. of Cd.
(O = 16) (O = 15.96)
112.0706. 111.7904.
These results agree more closely with those of von Hauer and Lenssen
than with those of any other experimenter. The following table gives
a comparison of the work of these investigators with that herein
described:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account