Dialogues of the DeadLyttelton, George Lyttelton, Baron
Philosophy
Dialogues of the Dead
Lyttelton, George Lyttelton, Baron
Dialogues, English -- Early works to 1800; Imaginary conversations
_Guise_.--If neither I nor that prince had ever practised your maxims in
any part of our conduct, he would have reigned many years with honour and
peace, and I should have risen by my courage and talents to as high a
pitch of greatness as it consisted with the duty of a subject to desire.
But your instructions led us on into those crooked paths, out of which
there was no retreat without great danger, nor a possibility of advancing
without being detested by all mankind, and whoever is so has everything
to fear from that detestation. I will give you a proof of this in the
fate of a prince, who ought to have been your hero instead of Caesar
Borgia, because he was incomparably a greater man, and, of all who ever
lived, seems to have acted most steadily according to the rules laid down
by you; I mean Richard III., King of England. He stopped at no crime
that could be profitable to him; he was a dissembler, a hypocrite, a
murderer in cool blood. After the death of his brother he gained the
crown by cutting off, without pity, all who stood in his way. He trusted
no man any further than helped his own purposes and consisted with his
own safety. He liberally rewarded all services done him, but would not
let the remembrance of them atone for offences or save any man from
destruction who obstructed his views. Nevertheless, though his nature
shrunk from no wickedness which could serve his ambition, he possessed
and exercised all those virtues which you recommend to the practice of
your prince. He was bold and prudent in war, just and strict in the
general administration of his government, and particularly careful, by a
vigorous execution of the laws, to protect the people against injuries or
oppressions from the great. In all his actions and words there
constantly appeared the highest concern for the honour of the nation. He
was neither greedy of wealth that belonged to other men nor profuse of
his own, but knew how to give and where to save. He professed a most
edifying sense of religion, pretended great zeal for the reformation of
manners, and was really an example of sobriety, chastity, and temperance
in the whole course of his life. Nor did he shed any blood, but of those
who were such obstacles in his way to dominion as could not possibly be
removed by any other means. This was a prince after your heart, yet mark
his end. The horror his crimes had excited in the minds of his subjects,
and the detestation it produced, were so pernicious to him, that they
enabled an exile, who had no right to the crown, and whose abilities were
much inferior to his, to invade his realm and destroy him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account