[142] The interrogatives are derived from the _Arte_ (110v) and are presented in substantially the same order. The adverbial particles which begin with _uie_ are taken from (140-148v) and classified by Rodriguez as _posposiçao_. [143] The errata has; page 50, line 10, _doco_ read _coco_. This would require the _doco zo_ above to read _coco zo_. It seems that the errata should have read; page 50, line 16, which would have corrected this error. The punctuation is not corrected by the errata. [144] Rodriguez has the complete version; _Fitocuchi futacuchi cǔ cotoua cǔta vchideua nai_. [145] Rodriguez uses _vonna_ for _vonago_. [146] The material for this section is derived from the _Arte_ (74v and 76v). [147] Rodriguez has _Ayamari nai vyeua_, ... [148] For the temporal interrogatives cf. _Arte_ (89v-90v) and for the remaining forms 107-107v. [149] Cf. the _Dictionarium_ under _cras_. [150] The _Vocabulario_ has _sãnuru_ and _sannuru_ as the _ombin_ form of the attributive perfective _sarinuru_. [151] Cf. _Arte_ (74v). [152] The Spanish manuscript has _iya iya_. [153] Cf. _Arte_ (74v). [154] Cf. _Arte_ (75, 94v, and 123v-124v). [155] Cf. _Arte_ (94v) _Quixoua ano fito fodono gacuxǒdeua nai._ [156] Cf. _Arte_ (95 and 141). [157] Cf. _Arte_ (75). [158] The _Dictionarium_ has a selection of a dozen intensifying adverbs listed under _valde_. [159] Cf. _Arte_ (74v, 75, and 76). [160] Cf. _Arte_ (74, 75, and 75v). [161] The _Dictionarium_ also has the spelling _moxi_ which suggests that Collado perceived a different vowel quantity than Rodriguez who has _mǒxi_, as does the _Vocabulario_. [162] The Latin particle is _nonne_, which expects an affirmative answer. [163] Rodriguez, and consequently Doi (_Nihon daibunten_, p. 449), have _xidai_ for _xisai_. The original source is the _Esopo no Fabulas_ where on p. 493 the form is _xisai_. [164] While the material for this section has been drawn from various portions of the _Arte_, Rodriguez handles the bulk of the matters dealt with here on 106v-108v and 140-148v. [165] The text is not clear at this point. It reads: Tame, _significat ni vel erga: v.g._ ... where one would expect: Tame _vel_ ni _significat erga: v.g._ ... Ōtsuka translates this passage as if it were the later, as do I. [166] Collado has recast into the colloquial a quote from the _Shikimoku_. Rodriguez records: _Mata daiquanni itatteua ichininnomi sadamubequi nari_. [167] The text reads: itatte _v.g._ totte.... where the _v.g._ is clearly a misprint of _vel_. [168] Cf. _Arte_ (130-137).