Dissertation on the Gipseys: Representing their manner of life, family economy, occupations & trades, marriages & education, sickness, death, & burial, religion, language, sciences & arts, &c. &c. &c.; with an historical enquiry concerning their origin & first appearance in EuropeGrellmann, Heinrich Moritz Gottlieb
History
Dissertation on the Gipseys: Representing their manner of life, family economy, occupations & trades, marriages & education, sickness, death, & burial, religion, language, sciences & arts, &c. &c. &c.; with an historical enquiry concerning their origin & first appearance in Europe
Grellmann, Heinrich Moritz Gottlieb
Romanies
This _tsche fátsch_, which should be _tsche se fak_, is a monstrous
perversion of language. But the Gipsey wanted a rhyme for _quatsch_; so
directly, with a bold poetical licence, he changes the first person of
the conjunctive for the third of the indicative mood. Thus this little
composition, in question and answer, which should be,
Little one, Little one, come from thence!
No, no, no, no, _I have nothing to do_ (_there_).
he changes to, _I have nothing_, _what do you_?
{89} Sulzer, with respect to their timidity, says: “A Gipsey requires to
have been a long time in the army before he can meet an enemy’s balls
with decent soldier’s resolution; or to be an experienced robber, before
he can take a traveller’s purse, without having first, from a bush,
either killed or disabled him.” There is a proverb in Transylvania, that
“You may drive fifty Gipseys before you with a wet rag.” Thicknesse
found the Gipseys exactly the same in Spain.
{89a} There are a number of serious pagination errors in the book.
Pages 1–98 are numbered correctly, but what should be page 99 is numbered
89, with the numbering continuing 89–121. Following this the page number
changes to 132 and continues 132–179, when it changes to 182, 183, 182
(again), 183, 186, 187, 186 (again), 187 (again), 190, 191, 190 (again),
191 (again), 194 and then normally to the end of the book. In this
transcription the page numbers are as per the book.—DP.
{113} _Wilhelm Dilick_, in his _Heszischen Chronik._ Seit 229. beyn Jahr
1414, certainly does say that they arrived during the same year in the
Hessian territories; and Fabricius, in _Annalibb. Misn._ says they were
driven from Meissen in 1416. But Calvisius contradicts Fabricius, and
has corrected his date, putting 1418 for 1416. And with regard to
Dilich, there must either have been a mistake in the manuscript from
which he composed, or he must have read wrong; there being no mention
made of Gipseys in any of the public prints till three years afterwards,
viz. 1417. It is absurd to suppose they should remain invisible to every
other person both in and out of Germany, at the same time they appeared
to the editor of Dilich’s intelligence.
{132} But we have more than circumstantial proof of the existence of
these safe-conducts, as besides a later, but here very pertinent, order
of the former great Hungarian count Thurzo, given in the year 1616,
remarkable for its serious and humane contents, an older one, granted in
the earliest age of the Gipseys, is still extant. It is written on
paper, and was brought by those who were at Regenspurgh in 1423. Andreas
Presbyter copied it into his six-years Journal, which was in the
possession of Oefelius.
{137} The eastern division of the present kingdom of Tunis.
{138} Zichen, Zigier, or Zincher, among the ancients, called in the
earliest times Achæans, dwelt in the country now inhabited by the
Circassians.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account