Dissertation on the Gipseys: Representing their manner of life, family economy, occupations & trades, marriages & education, sickness, death, & burial, religion, language, sciences & arts, &c. &c. &c.; with an historical enquiry concerning their origin & first appearance in EuropeGrellmann, Heinrich Moritz Gottlieb
History
Dissertation on the Gipseys: Representing their manner of life, family economy, occupations & trades, marriages & education, sickness, death, & burial, religion, language, sciences & arts, &c. &c. &c.; with an historical enquiry concerning their origin & first appearance in Europe
Grellmann, Heinrich Moritz Gottlieb
Romanies
All these opinions are merely conjecture; it would therefore be useless
to proceed with the list of them: but it may be proper to cite a few
which seem to have a greater appearance of probability. Let us begin
with Wagenseil. He considers the Gipseys to be German Jews; who about
the middle of the fourteenth century, to escape the dreadful persecution
which raged against them all over Europe, especially in Germany, secreted
themselves in forests, {141} deserts, and subterraneous caverns. In
these hiding-places they remained above half a century, not making their
appearance again till the period of the Hussites: as the Hussish heresy
then engrossed the public attention, with regard to the Jews all was
safe. But not daring to declare themselves, they fell on the device of
saying, that their respect for the Mosaic law would not permit them to
become Christians, at the same time styling themselves, in general terms,
Egyptian pilgrims. Those who did not yet know what they were, nor whence
they came, from their wandering about (_einherzichen_) called them
Gipseys (_Zigeuner_). To establish this supposition respecting the
origin of the Gipseys, he refers to their language, which he says is a
mixture of German and Hebrew, quoting, in proof of his assertion, near
fifty words, which are evidently Hebrew. He then asks, Whence should the
Gipseys have gotten so many Hebrew words into their language, if they
were not Jews; at a time too when Hebrew was unknown to all other
nations?—This opinion bears infinitely more the appearance of truth, than
any one of those before cited. It must also have been deemed
incontrovertible by the learned author, as he mentions it, in the
introduction to his treatise, with great confidence, and as much
self-congratulation as if he had discovered the philosopher’s-stone.
Notwithstanding all this, the confutation is so short and easy, that very
few words are sufficient to overturn the whole system; which rests
entirely on the language:—the words quoted are taken from a gibberish
vocabulary; but gibberish is not the Gipsey language. . . . What relates
to the Jewish persecution is very just; but all the rest are mere, and
frequently inconsistent, conjectures, founded on it by the learned
writer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account