Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia UniversityNeal, John Randolph
History
Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia University
Neal, John Randolph
Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Tennessee; Tennessee -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865; Thesis (Ph. D.)
Note: Images of the original pages are available through
Internet Archive. See
https://archive.org/details/disunionrestorat00neal
Transcriber’s note:
Text enclosed by underscores is in italics (_italics_).
DISUNION AND RESTORATION IN TENNESSEE
by
JOHN RANDOLPH NEAL, M.A., LL.B.
Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
in the Faculty of Political Science
Columbia University
New York
The Knickerbocker Press
1899
CONTENTS.
CHAPTER PAGE
I. SEPARATION 1
II. RESPONSIBILITY FOR SEPARATION 12
III. LOYALTY OF EAST TENNESSEE 16
IV. RESTORATION OF CIVIL GOVERNMENT 24
V. RECOGNITION BY CONGRESS 32
VI. TENNESSEE AND THE NEW AMENDMENTS 39
VII. FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION OF THE RADICAL GOVERNMENT 44
VIII. RADICAL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION 52
IX. KU-KLUX OUTRAGES 57
X. CLOSE OF THE RADICAL DOMINATION 66
XI. CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF 1870 74
DISUNION AND RESTORATION IN TENNESSEE
CHAPTER I
SEPARATION
The vote of Tennessee in the presidential election of 1860 shows
conclusively that at that time a majority of her citizens did not hold
disunion sentiments. Her electoral vote was cast for John Bell and
Edward Everett, who represented, as their platform expressed it, “no
political principle other than the Constitution of the country, the
Union of the States, and the enforcement of the laws.”
The first step toward secession was not the result of popular
initiative, but was mainly due to the efforts of the Governor of the
State, Isham G. Harris. Governor Harris had entered public life just
after the rupture between Andrew Jackson and Hugh Lawson White, which
had resulted in the formation, in Tennessee, of the Whig party. For
thirty years the Whigs and Democrats contended for the control of the
State. They were so equally matched that victory often turned upon the
individual strength of the candidate. This resulted in the development
of a class of public men who possessed, in a high degree, the usually
divergent abilities of public speakers and party leaders. From this
school of practical politics were graduated James K. Polk, Cave
Johnson, Felix Grundy, John Bell, and Andrew Johnson.
The contest between the Whigs and Democrats, which was at first merely
a personal quarrel, soon ripened into a division along true party
lines. The Democrats, after the death of Andrew Jackson, joined the
national Democratic party in its struggle for the perpetuation and
extension of slavery. The Whigs on the other hand shared in the broad
policies and national aspirations of the national Whig party.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account