Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia University — John Shaqi
Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia UniversityNeal, John Randolph
History
Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia University
Neal, John Randolph
Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Tennessee; Tennessee -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865; Thesis (Ph. D.)
“That the Legislative Assembly is but the creature of the
Constitution of the State, and has no power to enact any
laws or to perform any act of sovereignty, except such as
may be authorized by that instrument: and believing, as we
do, that in their recent legislation, the General Assembly
have disregarded the rights of the people and transcended
their own legitimate powers, we feel constrained, and we
invoke the people throughout the State, as they value their
liberties, to visit that hasty, unconsiderate, and
unconstitutional legislation with a decided rebuke, by
voting on the eighth day of next month against both the Act
of Secession and that of Union with the Confederate States.
“That the Legislature of the State, without having first
obtained the consent of the people, had no authority to
enter a ‘Military League’ with the ‘Confederate States’
against the General Government, and by so doing to put the
State of Tennessee in hostile array against the Government
of which it then was and still is a member. Such legislation
is in advance of the expressed will of the people to change
their governmental relations, was an act of usurpation, and
should be visited with the severest condemnation of the
people.”
This report was unanimously adopted by the Convention and ordered to
be printed, so that it might be circulated among the voters of the
State. Before the Convention adjourned it was addressed by Andrew
Johnson. According to a contemporary report, “he spoke for three hours
and commanded earnest attention throughout his entire speech.”
In the election of June 8th, the vote of East Tennessee stood: 14,780,
separation; 39,923, no separation; 14,601, representation; 32,962, no
representation.
Nine days after the election, a second Convention of Union men
assembled at Greenville. Two hundred and ninety-nine delegates were
present. Many of them were in favor of forming at once a Provisional
Government and organizing an army, but after a heated discussion more
moderate counsel prevailed. A Declaration of Grievances was drawn up
by the same committee that had prepared the address to the people
adopted by the Knoxville Convention. A new committee was appointed to
prepare and present a memorial to the State Legislature, asking its
consent to the formation of a new State to be composed of East
Tennessee and such counties in Middle Tennessee as desired to
coöperate to that end. But before this committee had an opportunity to
present the memorial to the Legislature the Confederate Government had
put it beyond the power of Tennessee to act in the matter by
organizing East Tennessee into a military department, and placing
General Zolicoffer in supreme command. His presence in Knoxville with
several regiments of soldiers prevented any further steps towards the
formation of a new State hostile to the Confederacy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account