Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia UniversityNeal, John Randolph
History
Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia University
Neal, John Randolph
Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Tennessee; Tennessee -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865; Thesis (Ph. D.)
After the intense excitement created by the bridge-burning had
somewhat subsided, the Confederate and State authorities again
manifested a desire to win over, or at least conciliate, the Union
element. The commander at Knoxville issued a proclamation to the
“Disaffected People of East Tennessee,” and assured “all those
interested who have fled to the enemy’s lines, and who are actually in
their army, that he will welcome their return to their homes and their
friends; they are offered amnesty and protection, if they come to lay
down their arms, and act as loyal citizens.” But these conciliatory
measures again met with failure, as it soon became necessary to
enforce the military drafts, which aroused the greatest opposition. In
the summer of 1863, East Tennessee became the theatre of active war.
Its history for the next three years is to be found in the military
annals of the State.
[7] Hume’s, _Loyal Mountaineers of Tennessee_.
[8] See Everett’s “Account of the Fund for the Relief of
East Tennessee.”
CHAPTER IV
THE RESTORATION OF CIVIL GOVERNMENT
While Tennessee escaped both executive and congressional
reconstruction, it did not follow in the restoration of its civil
government the plan laid down by President Lincoln. The most
distinctive feature of Lincoln’s reconstruction policy lay in the fact
that it made the old political people in each of the Southern States
self-acting nuclei, which were to bring order out of chaos. According
to this theory, neither the President nor Congress had the power to
reconstruct a State government. The people within a State alone had
the right to initiate and carry into effect measures for the
rehabilitation of the deranged governmental machinery. It was the duty
of the President under Article IV, Section 4, of the Constitution, to
see that their efforts in this direction did not prove abortive by
reason of domestic violence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account