Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia UniversityNeal, John Randolph
History
Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia University
Neal, John Randolph
Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Tennessee; Tennessee -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865; Thesis (Ph. D.)
The germs of this policy may be seen in the instructions sent to the
military governors. It was more fully developed in the amnesty
proclamation of Dec. 8, 1863. By the terms of this proclamation, a
general pardon was granted to all “who directly or by implication had
participated in the rebellion, with certain exceptions specified, upon
their taking an oath to henceforth support the Constitution of the
United States, and abide by the proclamations of the President and the
acts of Congress in relation to slavery.” It was further promised,
“that whenever a number of persons in any of the rebel States, equal
to not less than one tenth of the votes cast in such State in the
presidential election of the year 1860, each having taken the oath
aforesaid, and not having violated it, and being a qualified voter by
the election law of the State existing immediately before the
so-called act of secession, and excluding all others, shall establish
a State government which shall be republican in form, and in nowise
contravening said oath, such shall be recognized as the true
government of the State.”
This was, substantially, Lincoln’s plan for reconstruction. It was not
carried out in any of the Southern States. In all, except Tennessee,
it was succeeded by executive reconstruction under Johnson, which was
in turn supplanted by congressional reconstruction. In Tennessee an
entirely original plan was adopted. This plan shut out from
participation in the work of organizing civil government, all those
who had taken part in secession. An oath of past loyalty was made the
test of political capacity. In short, the restored civil government in
Tennessee was based solely on that portion of its inhabitants that had
remained loyal to the Union. These Union men, or Radicals as they
chose to call themselves, composed about one third of the population
of the State, and represented about one fifth of the taxpayers. It
will be the object of this chapter to trace the steps by which this
small minority seized the reins of government and exercised for three
years absolute control of the State.
After the fall of Fort Donelson, on February 15, 1862, the greater
part of Tennessee soon came into the possession of the Union army,
president Lincoln immediately appointed Andrew Johnson military
governor. Athough vested with almost unlimited powers, Governor
Johnson had at first little opportunity for their exercise, as the
Union army did not remain in peaceful possession of the State. Along
the southern border raged the bloody battles of Shiloh, Chickamauga,
and Missionary Ridge.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account