Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia UniversityNeal, John Randolph
History
Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia University
Neal, John Randolph
Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Tennessee; Tennessee -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865; Thesis (Ph. D.)
Most of the Union leaders in the Legislature desired the absolute
disfranchisement of the “rebels,” but it was feared so extreme a
measure would arouse hostility in Congress to seating the
Representatives from Tennessee. A compromise bill, known as the Arnell
Bill,[11] was finally passed. By its provisions the right to vote was
restricted to the following persons: “White men over twenty-one years
old, who were publicly known to have entertained unconditional Union
sentiment from the outbreak of the Rebellion, or who arrived at age
since March 4, 1866, and who had not been engaged in armed rebellion
against the United States Government, also those who had served in the
Federal army, and been honorably discharged, those who had been
conscripted by force in the Confederate army, and were known to be
Union men, and all those who had voted at the election in March and
February, 1865.” All other persons were disfranchised. For all persons
who had held civil or diplomatic office under the Confederate
Government, or who had held military offices above the ranks of
captain in the Confederate army, or lieutenant in the Confederate
navy, also for those who had resigned from the Congress of the United
States, or the army or navy of the United States, the term of
disfranchisement was for fifteen years. For all other persons from
whom the suffrage was withheld the disfranchisement was to last only
four years.
The first election to occur after the passage of the Arnell Franchise
Law, was the congressional election of August 3, 1865. All the
candidates were Union men, but one set represented the conservative
element which opposed disfranchisement and tests oaths. The Radicals
felt perfectly confident of defeating the Conservatives, if the
provisions of the new law were carried out. But it soon became evident
that the Radicals had much to fear both from open violation of the
law, and secret intimidation of the voter. Governor Brownlow, on the
10th of July, issued a proclamation declaring “that all who had banded
together to defeat the franchise law would be dealt with as rebels.”
The election passed off without violence. On the 10th of August,
before all the returns were in, Governor Brownlow requested the clerks
and sheriffs to give him information as to illegal voting. On the
information thus received, he cast out the vote of twenty-five
counties. Notwithstanding this action of the Governor, four of the
Conservatives were elected.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account