Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia UniversityNeal, John Randolph
History
Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia University
Neal, John Randolph
Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Tennessee; Tennessee -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865; Thesis (Ph. D.)
Exasperated at the repeated failure of the Sergeant-at-arms to arrest
the hiding members, Governor Brownlow, on the 14th of July, applied to
General Thomas for military assistance. This request was referred to
the Secretary of War, Mr. Stanton, who replied: “That the duty of the
United States forces is not to interfere in any way in the
controversies between the political authorities of the State, and Gen.
Thomas will strictly refrain from any interference between them.”
The deadlock was finally broken on the 19th of July, in a somewhat
extraordinary manner. Two members, arrested by the Sergeant-at-arms,
were brought to the Capitol, and placed in a committee-room
communicating with the hall of the House. A motion was then passed
that they “be invited and required to take their seats within the bar
of the House.” The two members refused to come out of the committee
and continued to remain silent when their names were called. The
Speaker thereupon declared that no quorum was present. An appeal was
taken from this ruling, and it was reversed. The House then proceeded
to a vote upon the amendment; and it was declared duly ratified,
forty-three votes having been cast in the affirmative, and eleven in
the negative.
In the meantime, Mr. Williams, one of the arrested members, applied
for and obtained a writ of habeas corpus. It was made returnable to
Thomas N. Frazier, Judge of the Criminal Court of Davidson County,
who, upon the hearing of the case, discharged Mr. Williams from the
custody of the Sergeant-at-arms. On account of this decision, the
House of Representatives preferred articles of impeachment against
Judge Frazier. He was tried by the Senate, sitting as a Court of
Impeachment. It sustained the articles of impeachment, and deposed
Judge Frazier from office. He was also forever disqualified from
holding any office of profit or trust in the State. His
disqualifications were however removed by the Constitutional
Convention of 1870, and he was afterward re-elected Criminal Judge.
The Fifteenth Amendment was submitted to Tennessee in 1869, just
before the close of the radical era. The suffrage had been conferred
upon the negro by an act of the Legislature of the previous year, but
it was known that the whole question would be reopened by the
Constitutional Convention which had just been called. The Legislature,
therefore, refused to take final action on the amendment. It was
referred to the Committee on Federal Relations, from which it was
never reported.
[13] Acts of Tennessee, Extra Session, 1866.
CHAPTER VII
FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION OF THE RADICAL GOVERNMENT
The joint resolution of July 24, 1866, completed, so far as Congress
was concerned, the restoration of civil government in Tennessee. Her
Senators and Representatives were admitted to their seats, and the
State, to all intents and purposes, was restored to the same position
it had occupied prior to the attempted withdrawal in 1861.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account