Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia UniversityNeal, John Randolph
History
Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia University
Neal, John Randolph
Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Tennessee; Tennessee -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865; Thesis (Ph. D.)
In this memorial they expressed a deep solicitude for the peace and
quiet of the State, protested against the charge of hostility to the
State government, or of a desire for its overthrow by revolutionary or
lawless means, as well as against the charge that those who had been
associated with them in the past days contemplated any such rashness
or folly; nor did they believe that there was in Tennessee any
organization, public or secret, which had such a purpose, and that, if
there was, they had neither sympathy nor affiliation therewith. They
further declared, that the peace of the State did not require a
military organization; that such a measure might bring about and
promote collisions rather than conserve the harmony and good order of
society; and finally that they would pledge themselves to maintain the
order and peace of the State with whatever influence they possessed,
and would uphold and support the laws and aid the constituted
authorities in their execution, trusting that a reciprocation of those
sentiments would produce the enactment of such laws as would remove
all causes disturbing society.
“For,” they continued, “when it is remembered that the large mass of
white men in Tennessee are denied the right to vote or to hold office,
it is not wonderful or unnatural there should exist more or less
dissatisfaction among them. And we beg leave respectfully to submit to
your consideration that prompt and efficient action on the part of the
proper authorities, for the removal of the political disabilities
resting upon so many of our people, would heal all the wounds of our
State, and make us once more a prosperous, contented, and united
people.”[16]
This memorial came too late to allay the excited minds of the
Radicals. On the 10th of September, the Legislature passed a bill “to
preserve the public peace.” This bill imposes “a fine of not less than
five hundred dollars, and imprisonment in the penitentiary for not
less than five years, and renders infamous any person who shall unite
with, associate with, promote or encourage any organization of persons
who shall prowl through the counties and towns of this State, by day
or night, for the purpose of disturbing the peace or alarming the
peaceful citizens of any part of the State. In order to secure the
proper execution of this act, the same punishment is to be meted out
to any person summoned as a witness, who shall fail or refuse to obey
the summons, or who shall appear and refuse to testify; the same to
any prosecuting attorney who shall be informed of the violation of the
act, and fail or refuse to prosecute the person informed on; the same
to any officer or other person who shall inform any other person that
he was to be summoned as a witness, with the intent of defeating any
of the provisions of the act; the same to any one who shall feed,
lodge, or entertain or conceal in the woods, or elsewhere, any one
known to such person to be charged with an offence under the act.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account