Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia UniversityNeal, John Randolph
History
Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia University
Neal, John Randolph
Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Tennessee; Tennessee -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865; Thesis (Ph. D.)
“The so-called Radical State Convention, the most
disgraceful, profane, and vulgar assemblage of men ever
congregated in the State to consider public affairs, came to
an abrupt termination yesterday, after an ineffectual
attempt of two days to organize. It simply dissolved. It
could not even adjourn. It had no chairman, no secretary,
and could not even transact any business. It met as if by
chance, and dispersed from necessity. It was an agglomerate
discord, an inflamed mob filled with mean whiskey and meaner
passions. It was a meeting of mortal enemies under the guise
of friendship to decide the spoils of misdeeds and crimes.
They quarrelled and fought, and called each other liars and
thieves, and all manner of epithets. Such a congregation of
vulgar elements, so fierce, so bitter, and so reckless, was
never seen before in this section of the Union.
“This assemblage of Radicals was called together to counsel
for the good of the State, and present to the people a
person of such fair name and true patriotism as to be worthy
of them and the State for their chief executive!”
The above description was written by a “rebel” editor, but the
following account, taken from the _Knoxville Whig_, is scarcely less
severe: “We share in the regret of all good Republicans that the late
Convention was so divided, boisterous, disrupted. We have attended
many conventions, national and State. We never attended one in which
such injustice, violence, and fraud were practised.”
These two pictures of the Convention, drawn from different
standpoints, give us some idea of the kind of men that had ruled
Tennessee for four years. At last the household was divided against
itself; it was only a matter of a few weeks until it should fall.
The Senter faction attempted to throw the blame for the disrupted
Convention upon Mr. Stokes and his friends. They denied the charge,
and asserted that at least sixty-four counties had been instructed for
Mr. Stokes, which would have insured him the nomination. The result of
the discussion was that Governor Senter and Mr. Stokes declared their
intentions to “fight it to a finish at the polls.” They began at
Nashville, January 5th, a joint canvass of the State. A direct issue
was soon made between them on the franchise question. Governor Senter
declared “that the time has come, and is now, when the limitations and
disabilities which have found their way into our statute-books, as the
result of the war, should be abolished and removed, and the privilege
of the elective franchise be restored, and extended so far as to
embrace the mass of the adult population of the State.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account