Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia University — John Shaqi
Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia UniversityNeal, John Randolph
History
Disunion and Restoration in Tennessee: Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science, Columbia University
Neal, John Randolph
Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Tennessee; Tennessee -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865; Thesis (Ph. D.)
But before Governor Senter could make any change in the
administration, the State was plunged into a heated campaign to elect
his successor. He was entitled by the Constitution to serve out
Brownlow’s unexpired term, but only a few months remained of that. His
aspirations naturally went beyond his brief _pro tem._ term, and he,
therefore, announced his intention of becoming a candidate subject to
the approval of the Union party.
A new candidate soon appeared in the person of W. B. Stokes. Mr.
Stokes was the Representative of the Third District in Congress. His
record had been somewhat similar to that of Governor Senter. At the
beginning of the war he had identified himself with the secession
movement, but had quickly deserted what he saw to be a sinking ship.
After the war, as if to make amends for his past conduct, he became
one of the most extreme and bitter Radicals.
At first, the canvass was a mere personal contest, having little
significance to any one except the Radical leaders. A Convention of
the Union party was called to meet in Nashville on May 22d. Both
candidates pledged themselves to abide by the decision of this
Convention.
Ex-President Johnson’s return to Tennessee at this time added to the
uncertainty of the contest. He was still a power in Tennessee
politics, and it was rumored that he might enter the race as a
Conservative Democrat. The Radical Convention assembled in Nashville
on the day appointed. It was called to order by Thos. Cates, chairman
of the Central Committee, who was a Stokes man. After the reading of
the call, Judge Houck moved that Mr. Pearne, a friend of Governor
Senter, be made temporary chairman of the Convention. His motion
having failed to be recognized by Mr. Cates, he put it to the House
himself and declared Mr. Pearne elected. Mr. Pearne attempted to reach
the chair, but was forcibly prevented. This resulted in a hand-to-hand
contest between the delegates. Failing to perfect a temporary
organization, the Convention adjourned until the following day. But at
the second meeting the disgraceful scenes of the first were repeated.
It finally dissolved amid the utmost confusion.
_The Union and American_, a daily newspaper, published in Nashville,
contained the following report of the Convention’s proceedings.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account