Doctor Grimshawe's Secret — a RomanceHawthorne, Nathaniel
Science
Doctor Grimshawe's Secret — a Romance
Hawthorne, Nathaniel
Fiction
It is very remarkable that Ned had so much good in him as we find there;
in the first place, born as he seemed to be of a wild, vagrant stock, a
seedling sown by the breezes, and falling among the rocks and sands; the
growing up without a mother to cultivate his tenderness with kisses
and the inestimable, inevitable love of love breaking out on all little
occasions, without reference to merit or demerit, unfailing whether or
no; mother’s faith in excellences, the buds which were yet invisible
to all other eyes, but to which her warm faith was the genial sunshine
necessary to their growth; mother’s generous interpretation of all that
was doubtful in him, and which might turn out good or bad, according
as should be believed of it; mother’s pride in whatever the boy
accomplished, and unfailing excuses, explanations, apologies, so
satisfactory, for all his failures; mother’s deep intuitive insight,
which should see the permanent good beneath all the appearance of
temporary evil, being wiser through her love than the wisest sage could
be,--the dullest, homeliest mother than the wisest sage. The Creator,
apparently, has set a little of his own infinite wisdom and love (which
are one) in a mother’s heart, so that no child, in the common course of
things, should grow up without some heavenly instruction. Instead of
all this, and the vast deal more that mothers do for children, there had
been only the gruff, passionate Doctor, without sense of religion,
with only a fitful tenderness, with years’ length between the fits, so
fiercely critical, so wholly unradiant of hope, misanthropic, savagely
morbid. Yes; there was little Elsie too; it must have been that she was
the boy’s preserver, being childhood, sisterhood, womanhood, all that
there had been for him of human life, and enough--he being naturally of
such good stuff--to keep him good. He had lost much, but not all: he
was not nearly what he might have been under better auspices; flaws and
imperfections there were, in abundance, great uncultivated wastes and
wildernesses in his moral nature, tangled wilds where there might have
been stately, venerable religious groves; but there was no rank growth
of evil. That unknown mother, that had no opportunity to nurse her boy,
must have had gentle and noblest qualities to endow him with; a noble
father, too, a long, unstained descent, one would have thought. Was this
an almshouse child?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account