Doctor Mead's Short discourse explain'd : $b Being a clearer account of pestilential contagion, and preventing.
History
Doctor Mead's Short discourse explain'd : $b Being a clearer account of pestilential contagion, and preventing.
Communicable diseases -- Early works to 1800; Mead, Richard, 1673-1754. Short discourse concerning pestilential contagion; Plague -- Early works to 1800
That we may see, how little Doctor _Mead_ understands the Method of
_Preventing_, and also how practicable it is: We find _Hippocrates_
values himself for being the first that foresaw a Disease; and he tells
us, That [20]_Diseases do not come upon Men of a sudden; but being
collected by degrees, shew themselves afterwards in the bulk_. And
[21]_Galen_ says, That _all Physicians are agreed, that there must be
some Time for breeding a Distemper_. Now, if Diseases take a Time before
they are bred; then it is an obvious Consequence, that Diseases may be
prevented. Surely this is consonant to common Sense; for an _Embryo_
Disease must be far more easily cured, than a Disease after it is
formed, and settled upon any Person; and thereby his Strength, or
Constitution, destroyed: For however _Curative_ Method, and
_Preservative_, are different Words, they only signify the same Thing at
different Times. Curing a nascent Disease is _preserving_ us from being
hurt by it; and curing a settled Disease, where the Instruments of
Action are hurt, is curing it in the common Acceptation.
[Footnote 20: Lib. 1. _De Vict. rat._ Lib. 3. _De Diæta_.]
[Footnote 21: Lib. 1. _De loc. affect._ Pag. 13. Junt.]
And therefore our Doctor seems to have no manner of Notion of these
Words, when he would tell us that it is as impossible to prevent the
Plague; as to have a _Specifick Preservative from the Small Pox_; which
we find is far from being impossible. But why a _Specifick_? Must he
have a Specifick, because Dr. _Anodyne Necklace_ has one? I cannot find
any other Reason, especially, that it now plainly appears, and is
evident, that curing a Disease, and preventing it, is the same Action,
and may be done with the same Tools, whether they are Common, or
Specifick, in the strictest Sense Physicians use those Words. This his
Misunderstanding the Doctrine of Physicians is further manifest from the
last Paragraph of his Discourse; that his Directions may _be of Use
towards establishing a better Method of Cure_, than Authors have
commonly taught, which might be true, if that Doctrine had been drawn
from the Nature of _Infection_ or _Contagion_; but, at present, he knows
as little of the grammatical Sense of these Terms, as he does of the
Things themselves.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account