Doctor Mead's Short discourse explain'd : $b Being a clearer account of pestilential contagion, and preventing.
History
Doctor Mead's Short discourse explain'd : $b Being a clearer account of pestilential contagion, and preventing.
Communicable diseases -- Early works to 1800; Mead, Richard, 1673-1754. Short discourse concerning pestilential contagion; Plague -- Early works to 1800
We will not insist upon this Sense of _Hippocrates_; but suppose he
there truly treats of the Plague, and that he has observed such a
Temperament of Air to have preceded it, what is this to Contagion and
Infection, which neither _Hippocrates_ nor _Galen_ ever dream’d of.
Besides, _Hippocrates_ calls the Plague a Fever, and in his Opinion
several Affections of Air, to him, and us, perhaps, unknown, produced
Plagues, or Fevers (for these Words are synonimous with him) and the
greatest Part of other Diseases. So that it is manifest from
_Hippocrates_, that this, and many other Alterations of the Air do not
make it _Infectious_.
The following Paragraph is of no Force, after what is now said
concerning _Hippocrates_; the best Historian, that is not a Physician,
is never presumed to go beyond an Account and Relation of Matter of
Fact, as he apprehends it; and so far went the great _Thucydides_, in
relating the Plague of _Athens_. We will rather consider what the Doctor
alledges for strengthning his Conjecture about Contagion. [2]_Stinks of
stagnating Waters, in hot Weather; putrid Exhalations from the Earth;
and above all, the Corruption of dead Carcasses being unburied, have
occasion’d infectious Diseases._ Let us now suppose this Account to be
true, yet his chief Article about Carcasses is absolutely false, as may
be prov’d by one of the best Physicians in any Age; what is all this to
Contagion breeding the Plague: For suppose again, some or all of them
occasion’d _infectious_ Diseases, the Consequence is not, _Ergo_, the
Plague; there being many contagious Diseases that are neither _Plague_
nor Mortal.
[Footnote 2: _Page 3._]
Yet, as if all this were Demonstration, he asserts, That the Plague is
produced by a _Concurrence_ of Causes; _and their first Effect is a
Degree of Stagnation in the Air_, which is follow’d by _Corruption_, and
Putrefaction. It is needless to enter upon this Hint of a new
_Hypothesis_; for if his Machine of Contagion, or Infection, be good,
these are unnecessary. But alas! the celebrated Doctor has, in the
Conclusion, destroy’d the whole Fabrick he had rear’d with so much
Trouble, after he had borrow’d Brick from one, Mortar from another, and
Timber from a third; and only because he became, against Nature and his
own Genius, a Master-Builder. Is a Concurrence of all the supposed
Causes necessary to make a Plague? Then there never was a Plague in the
World; and that because these Causes never all met together: A hopeful
Conclusion! and which at once delivers the World of insufferable Fears,
they hitherto groan’d under, by a vulgar Error; which is now contrary to
Experience, because it is so to Dr. _Mead_’s Reasoning.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account