Does civilization need religion? : $b A study in the social resources and limitations of religion in modern lifeNiebuhr, Reinhold
Religion
Does civilization need religion? : $b A study in the social resources and limitations of religion in modern life
Niebuhr, Reinhold
Christian civilization; Christianity; Philosophy and religion
“Make me a captive, Lord, and then I shall be
free,” has ever been the prayer of religious people. “He who loses his
life for my sake shall find it,” said Jesus. In such paradoxes the
truth is revealed that the highest peace comes to men where their life
is centered not in what is best in them but in that beyond them which
is better than their best.
Obviously this function of religion in the life of the individual
has its social implications; but it is not to be assumed that the
integration of personality automatically solves man’s social problem.
That assumption, which religion invariably makes, is one of its very
defects in dealing with the social problem. A unified personality may
still be anti-social in its dominant desires and the very self-respect
which issues from its higher integration may become the screen for its
unsocial attitudes.
Just as important as the problem of bringing peace to the warring
factions within the soul of man is the task of giving human personality
a sense of worth in the face of nature’s indifference and contempt;
and of adjusting man’s highest values to nature’s sublimer moods. The
significance of the religious inclinations of country people lies just
here. The peasant is religious because man’s relation to the natural
world about him is still the agrarian’s great interest. His ethical
life is simple and develops in those primary or family relationships in
which problems are comparatively few and a disturbance of the religious
temper by unethical social facts rather infrequent. He is close enough
to nature to be prompted to awe and reverence by her beauties and
sublimities, to gratitude by her vast and perennial benevolences,
and to fear by her occasional cruel caprices. He expresses his awe
in worship, his gratitude in the spring and harvest festivals, which
are traditional in all religions, and when her momentary atrocities
overtake him he appeals from nature’s God to the God who is above
nature and seeks the intervention of a supernatural ally in behalf of
human personality. In a sense the religion of peasants remains the
constant spring of religious sentiment in every class of society, which
others may corrupt or refine but never quite destroy. Urban men suffer
from an atrophy of the religious sense because they lose, as they are
divorced from the soil, some of the reverence to which a view of the
serene majesties of nature prompts and some of the fear occasioned by
her elemental passions. Yet the most sophisticated and emancipated
city dweller cannot finally escape the problem of the relation of the
human spirit to the natural world in which it is at once child and
rebel. Even the refinements and artificialities of urban life will not
save man from facing nature’s last and most implacable servant—death,
nor free him of the necessity of making some kind of appeal against
the obvious victory which nature claims at the grave. The fight of
personality against nature is religion’s first battle, and that is one
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account