Does civilization need religion? : $b A study in the social resources and limitations of religion in modern lifeNiebuhr, Reinhold
Religion
Does civilization need religion? : $b A study in the social resources and limitations of religion in modern life
Niebuhr, Reinhold
Christian civilization; Christianity; Philosophy and religion
reason why there is always a possibility that other struggles will
be neglected for it. Traditional religion fails in its social tasks
partly because men have suffered longer from the sins of nature than
from the sins of man; and religious forms and traditions are therefore
better adjusted to offer them comfort for these distresses than for
any other from which they suffer. Religion is not yet fully oriented
to the new perils to personality which are developed in civilization.
But it may fail to meet these and yet not be totally discredited; for
the new perils have not supplanted the old ones. At its best religion
is both a sublimation and a qualification of the will to live. Defeated
by nature the human spirit rises above nature through religious faith,
discovering and creating a universe in which divine personality is
the supreme power and human personality a cherished, protected and
deathless reality. But this religious sublimation of the will to live
must be balanced by a qualification of that will to live by which
men are persuaded to sacrifice themselves for each other, that they
may save themselves from each other and realize their highest self.
Love is a natural fruit of religion but not an inevitable one. A high
appreciation of personality ought to issue in a reverence for all
personalities and in a qualification of the tendency to self-assertion
for the sake of other personalities. But left to itself religion easily
becomes a force which sublimates but does not qualify man’s desire for
survival; in which case it may still function in simple societies but
will be less useful in those which are highly complex and in which the
problem of human relationships has become very important.
Next to the faith of agrarian classes the greatest stronghold of
religion is in the life of the middle classes of the city. This
phenomenon is due to several causes. Ideals of self-mastery and
personal rectitude are always strongest in those classes in which
physical resources are not so abundant as to tempt to sensual excesses
and not so scant as to lead to an obsession with life’s externalities.
For that reason the resources of religion for the solution of personal
moral problems are particularly coveted by the middle classes. On the
other hand the middle classes are also religious because they are
comparatively unconscious of their responsibility for society’s sins
and comparatively untouched by the evil consequences of an unethical
civilization. They may therefore indulge in a religion which creates
moral respectability, and reinforces self-respect, even though it does
not force them to share their sense of worth with all their fellows.
There is for this reason an element of hypocrisy in all middle-class
religion of which it never becomes clearly conscious but which helps to
create the corroding cynicism from which the lower classes of modern
society suffer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account