Does civilization need religion? : $b A study in the social resources and limitations of religion in modern lifeNiebuhr, Reinhold
Religion
Does civilization need religion? : $b A study in the social resources and limitations of religion in modern life
Niebuhr, Reinhold
Christian civilization; Christianity; Philosophy and religion
The physical characteristics and outward circumstances in which men
differ are sometimes not so great as they seem to the superficial
observer; wherefore education may do as much as religion to cultivate
and discover those profounder unities which made all men brothers.
There are hatreds which are due merely to misunderstanding. They
spring from the parochialism of the average mind, which knows no
better than to regard with contempt what differs from the standards
and values to which it has become habituated. Education and culture
may emancipate men from such hatreds. Other misunderstandings which
are caused by a superficial analysis of men’s action may be dissipated
by a profounder appreciation of the complex life of every individual
out of which each action emerges. Yet understanding alone does not
solve all the problems of living together. We do not hate only those
whom we do not know or understand. Sometimes we hate those most whom
we know best. Love does not flow inevitably out of intimacy. Intimacy
may merely accentuate previous attitudes, whether they be benevolent or
malevolent. Anthropologists are easily obsessed with the inequalities
which men reveal in their natural state, and the very abundance of
their knowledge prompts them to an ethically enervating determinism
when they attempt to gauge the potentialities of so-called primitive
peoples. The modern psychologists are more inclined to accept the
dogma of the total depravity of man than the ancient theologians were,
and they prove thereby that a profound knowledge of human nature need
not incline men to regard human beings with reverence and affection.
Mr. H. L. Mencken may not speak for the scientists, but he is somewhat
typical of the cynicism which follows in the wake of intellectualism.
His estimate of human beings is: “Man is a sick fly taking a dizzy ride
on a gigantic flywheel.... He is lazy, improvident, unclean.... Life
is a combat between jackals and jackasses.” Love is always slightly
irrational and requires an irrational urge for its support. It is at
least as irrational as hatred and the same intelligence which mitigates
the one may enervate the other. A highly sophisticated intelligence is
generally unable to survey the human scene with any higher attitude
than that of pity for human beings, and pity is a form of contempt
under a thin disguise of sympathy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account