Does civilization need religion? : $b A study in the social resources and limitations of religion in modern lifeNiebuhr, Reinhold
Religion
Does civilization need religion? : $b A study in the social resources and limitations of religion in modern life
Niebuhr, Reinhold
Christian civilization; Christianity; Philosophy and religion
The force of its faith operates not only to preserve moral vigor but to
sensitize moral judgments. The God of religious devotion is not only
revealed in the moral values of the universe outside of man, but he is
revealed in the aspirations of man which are beyond his achievements.
God insures not only the preservation of values but their perfection.
All moral achievement is qualified by the relativities of time and
circumstance. The worship of a holy God saves the soul from taking
premature satisfaction in its partial achievement. It subjects every
moral value to comparison with a more perfect moral ideal. Of course
the absolute perfection of God is itself conditioned by the imperfect
human insight which conceives it. A cruel age may picture God more
cruel than itself, and to a generation lusting for power God may be
the supreme tyrant. Thus religion may become the sanctification of
human imperfections. Yet in its highest form religion does inculcate
a wholesome spirit of humility which gives the soul no peace in any
virtue while higher virtue is attainable.
The force of religion in moral action and the necessity of religious
assurance for the highest type of social life may be gauged by
an analysis of possible alternatives to a social life which is
oriented by a religious world view. There are two real alternatives
to such a life. The one is based upon an ethical but unreligious
world view, and the other scorns both ethics and religion in its
absolute determinism. An ethical life which claims no support from
religion may on occasion develop a very high type of social idealism,
particularly since it escapes the ethical defects of religion even
while it sacrifices religious resources. Stoicism is in many respects
superior to pantheistic religions; for there are moral advantages in
underestimating rather than overestimating the virtue of the universe.
It is better to create a sense of tension between the conscience of
man and a morally indifferent nature than to obscure the moral defects
of nature by a deification of the natural order. But if men disavow
all faith in a power not their own which makes for righteousness,
they cannot finally save themselves from either arrogance or despair.
Religion may destroy man’s self-reliance by an undue sense of humility,
but even that limitation is no more destructive of moral values
than a self-reliance which prompts the human spirit to strut for a
while on this narrow world in the consciousness of unique virtue
before capitulating to a world which is too blind to know what it has
destroyed. Thomas Huxley thought he would as soon worship “a wilderness
of monkeys” as to give himself to the worship of humanity after the
fashion of Comte. To insist too strenuously upon the uniqueness of
human life in the cosmic order must inevitably issue in the pride
which such a worship implies. Since the Renaissance there has been a
marked decay of the spirit of humility in Western civilization which
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account