Domestic medicine : $b or, a treatise on the prevention and cure of diseases by regimen and simple medicines. With an appendix, containing a dispensatory for the use of private practitioners — John Shaqi
Domestic medicine : $b or, a treatise on the prevention and cure of diseases by regimen and simple medicines. With an appendix, containing a dispensatory for the use of private practitionersBuchan, William
Science
Domestic medicine : $b or, a treatise on the prevention and cure of diseases by regimen and simple medicines. With an appendix, containing a dispensatory for the use of private practitioners
Buchan, William
Medicine, Popular -- Early works to 1800
I know it will be said, that diffusing medical knowledge among the
people might induce them to tamper with Medicine, and to trust to their
own skill instead of calling a physician. The reverse of this however is
true. Persons who have most knowledge in these matters, are commonly
most ready both to ask and to follow advice, when it is necessary. The
ignorant are always most apt to tamper with Medicine, and have the least
confidence in physicians. Instances of this are daily to be met with
among the ignorant peasants, who, while they absolutely refuse to take a
medicine which has been prescribed by a physician, will swallow with
greediness any thing that is recommended to them by their credulous
neighbours. Where men will act even without knowledge, it is certainly
more rational to afford them all the light we can, than to leave them
entirely in the dark.
It may also be alleged, that laying Medicine more open to mankind would
lessen their faith in it. This would indeed be the case with regard to
some; but it would have a quite contrary effect upon others. I know many
people who have the utmost dread and horror of every thing prescribed by
a physician, but who will nevertheless very readily take a medicine
which they know, and whose qualities they are in some measure acquainted
with. Hence it is evident, that the dread arises from the doctor, not
from the drug. Nothing ever can or will inspire mankind with an absolute
confidence in physicians, but an open, frank, and undisguised behaviour.
While the least shadow of mystery remains in the conduct of the Faculty,
doubts, jealousies, and suspicions, will arise in the minds of men.
No doubt cases will sometimes occur, where a prudent physician may find
it expedient to disguise a medicine. The whims and humours of men must
be regarded by those who mean to do them service; but this can never
affect the general argument in favour of candour and openness. A man
might as well allege, because there are knaves and fools in the world,
that he ought to take every one he meets for such, and to treat him
accordingly. A sensible physician will always know where disguise is
necessary; but it ought never to appear on the face of his general
conduct.
The appearance of mystery in the conduct of physicians not only renders
their art suspicious, but lays the foundations of Quackery, which is the
disgrace of Medicine. No two characters can be more different than that
of the honest physician and the quack; yet they have generally been very
much confounded. The line between them is not sufficiently apparent; at
least it is too fine for the general eye. Few persons are able to
distinguish sufficiently between the conduct of that man who administers
a secret medicine, and him who writes a prescription in mystical
characters and an unknown tongue. Thus the conduct of the honest
physician, which needs no disguise, gives a sanction to that of the
villain, whose sole consequence depends upon secrecy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account