Before attempting to answer the question of what can and what cannot
be done, a few general principles deduced from the consideration of
the subject up to this point must be indicated. First, since the evils
are many and complicated no panacea can be found. The patent medicine
that cures every physical ailment from consumption to chilblains is
disappearing before the scientific studies of the day; it is quite as
little to be recommended for economic and social maladies. Second, the
remedy applied must have some relation to the nature of the disease. A
sprained wrist will not yield to the treatment for dyspepsia, nor can
rheumatism and deafness be cured by the same brown pills. The principle
does not differ if moral remedies are administered for educational
diseases and economic maladies are expected to succumb to social tonics.
Third, reform in domestic service must be accomplished along the same
general economic lines as are reforms in other great departments of
labor—not at right angles to general industrial progress. Fourth,
reform in domestic service must be the result of evolution from present
conditions and tendencies—not a special creation. Fifth, no reform can
be instituted which will remove to-morrow all difficulties that exist
to-day. Domestic service cannot reach at a bound the goal towards which
other forms of labor have been moving with halting steps.
These principles are simple and will perhaps be generally accepted. A
few of the measures often suggested as affording means of relief may be
tested by them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account