Washington, D.C. 13 Richmond, Va. 13 Atlanta, Ga. 14 Memphis, Tenn. 15 Nashville, Tenn. 16 New York, N.Y. 18 Boston, Mass. 18 St. Paul, Minn. 19 Minneapolis, Minn. 19 Omaha, Neb. 19 San Francisco, Cal. 20 Baltimore, Md. 21 Louisville, Ky. 21 Worcester, Mass. 21 Reading, Pa. 22 New Orleans, La. 23 Denver, Col. 23 Philadelphia, Pa. 24 Cambridge, Mass. 24 St. Louis, Mo. 25 Cincinnati, Ohio 26 Albany, N.Y. 26 Indianapolis, Ind. 26 Chicago, Ill. 27 New Haven, Conn. 27 Providence, R.I. 27 Syracuse, N.Y. 27 Wilmington, Del. 27 Columbus, Ohio 28 Pittsburg, Pa. 28 Brooklyn, N.Y. 29 Detroit, Mich. 29 Grand Rapids, Mich. 29 Kansas City, Mo. 29 Toledo, Ohio 29 Allegheny, Pa. 30 Buffalo, N.Y. 31 Troy, N.Y. 31 Cleveland, Ohio 33 Milwaukee, Wis. 33 Rochester, N.Y. 33 Dayton, Ohio 35 Jersey City, N.J. 35 Scranton, Pa. 36 Newark, N.J. 38 Camden, N.J. 39 Trenton, N.J. 40 Lowell, Mass. 43 Paterson, N.J. 68 Fall River, Mass. 73] The same fact may be illustrated in two other ways. In Washington, Richmond, Atlanta, Memphis, and Nashville,—the five cities having the largest number of domestic employees in proportion to the population,—the domestic employees constitute in each city more than fourteen per cent of the entire number of persons engaged in all gainful occupations. In these five cities more than one third of all women engaged in remunerative occupations are in domestic service. On the other hand, in Camden, Trenton, Lowell, Paterson, and Fall River,—the five cities having the smallest number of domestic employees in proportion to the population,—the per cent of domestic employees with reference to the total number of persons engaged in all gainful occupations is less than seven, while in Lowell and Paterson only ten per cent and in Fall River only seven per cent of all women engaged in remunerative occupations are in domestic service. The following table will show these contrasts: TABLE VI DOMESTIC SERVANTS AND WOMEN COMPARED WITH THOSE IN GAINFUL OCCUPATIONS