"In Heaven's name, how do you know that?"
"Why, for one thing, if this subterranean world was one of unbroken
darkness, the angel (and the demon) would be blind, like those poor
fishes in the Mammoth Cave. But she is no more blind than you or I.
Ergo, if for no other reason, we shall find light down there."
"Of course, they have artificial light, or--"
"I don't mean that. If there had not been some other illumination, this
strange race (of whose very existence Science has never even dreamed)
would have ceased to exist long ago--if, indeed, it ever could have
begun."
"But no gleam of sunlight can ever find its way down to that world."
"It never can, of course. But there are other sources of light--nebulas
and comets in the heavens, for example, and auroras, phosphorus and
fire-flies here on earth. The phenomena of phosphorescence are by no
means so rare as might be imagined. Why, as Nichol showed, though any
man who uses his eyes can see it himself, there is light inherent
_even in clouds_."
I have the professor's book before me as I write--J. P. Nichol, LL.D.,
Professor of Astronomy in the University of Glasgow--and here are his
own words:
"Whatever their origin, they [the auroras] show the existence of causes
in virtue of whose energy the upper strata of our atmosphere become
self-luminous, sometimes in a high degree; for, in northern regions,
our travelers have _read_ by their brilliance. But the Aurora is not
the only phenomenon which indicates the existence of a power in the
matter of our globe to emit light. One fact, that must have been
often noticed, forcibly impresses me with the conviction, that here,
through what seems common, truths of much import will yet be reached.
In the dead of night, when the sky is clear, and one is admiring the
brilliancy of the stars, hanging over a perfectly obscured earth, a
cloud, well known to observing astronomers, will at times begin to
form, and it then spreads with astonishing rapidity over the whole
heavens. The light of the stars being thus utterly shut out, one might
suppose that surrounding objects would, if possible, become more
indistinct: but no! what was formerly invisible can now be clearly
seen; not because of lights from the earth being reflected back from
the cloud--for very often there are none--but in virtue of _the light
of the cloud itself_, which, however faint, is yet a similitude of the
dazzling shell of the Sun."
After mentioning the phosphorescence of the dark hemisphere of Venus
and the belief that something similar has been seen on the unillumined
surface of our satellite, he continues thus:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account