Dyes and dyeingPellew, Charles E. (Charles Ernest), Viscount Exmouth
Science
Dyes and dyeing
Pellew, Charles E. (Charles Ernest), Viscount Exmouth
Dyes and dyeing
A short time ago a teacher of handicraft dyeing was expatiating, in
my presence, upon the impropriety of using any of the new chemical
processes for dyeing, and insisted that the only way to dye indigo
was to set up a vat, and feed it, and work with it as our ancestors
used to. It was suggested to her that it would be at least two or
three days before cloth could be dyed in such a vat. “Eight or ten
days at the earliest,” was the reply. And when it was hinted that
the vat would have to be frequently stirred during all that time,
she proudly answered, “Stirred regularly and thoroughly every single
half-hour, night and day, during the whole period.”
“H—m,” remarked a bystander, “that’s a little worse than sitting up
with a baby sick of the croup.”
Somehow the great advantage of this particular process over the
modern ones, by which a proper bath can be prepared in perhaps five
minutes, failed to impress itself on some of her listeners.
_Modern Chemical Vats._—As soon as it was understood just what
chemical action was going on in the vats, and the object of it,
chemists began to find out methods for reducing the indigo without
the necessity of a long, tedious, and even nasty fermentation
process. They first introduced the “copperas-lime” vat, where the
reduction was done by the use of ferrous sulphate (green vitriol or
copperas), and slaked lime was the alkali used to keep the indigo
white dissolved.
Later they introduced zinc dust, a very powerful reducing agent,
in place of the copperas, avoiding in this way the large amount of
precipitated iron oxide which always forms in the copperas vat,
and leads to the loss of dye, and muddiness and dulness of color,
necessitating a special clearing bath of dilute mineral acid.
At present the most satisfactory method is to use the chemical known
as _sodium hydrosulphite_, as a reducing agent, in a bath made
strongly alkaline with caustic soda. Hydrosulphite is not expensive;
it acts very rapidly, leaving no sediment; it causes no loss or
waste of the indigo; and it does its work perfectly. Hence, with its
introduction, the dyeing of indigo has become extremely simple.
To still further shorten and simplify the process, the large
manufacturers not only furnish indigo already ground up to a fine
paste with water, but also supply it already reduced by hydrosulphite
or some other reducing agent, so that it is almost ready to dye with
as it is, and will dissolve almost instantaneously in an alkaline
bath with the addition of just a little more reducing agent. Such
products are the Indigo Vat III (_Metz_), and the Indigo Solution 20%
(_Badische_). By using either of these, the preparation of a vat
large enough to dye 3 or 3½ pounds of cotton is the task of but a
few moments. These special preparations, however, are more expensive
than the regular 20% pastes, and the hydrosulphite vat is so easy to
prepare that the saving of time is hardly worth the extra cost.
DYEING DIRECTIONS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account